Zero of fourteen models named Meta Advanced Analytics first on the direct prompt; one named Databricks Clean Rooms. Meta Advanced Analytics was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Databricks Clean Rooms by thirteen and both carry 26 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
By Meta Platforms, Menlo Park, United States, founded 2004. Named in one category this edition.
By Databricks, San Francisco, United States, founded 2013. Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the data clean rooms page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Meta Advanced Analytics and Databricks Clean Rooms were named in the same answer twenty-three times, of the 57 answers naming Meta Advanced Analytics and the 74 naming Databricks Clean Rooms. In those answers Databricks Clean Rooms took the first choice zero times and Meta Advanced Analytics two.
| Model | DirectMA | ParaphraseMA | ComparativeMA | Budget-constrainedMA | Scale-constrainedMA | NegativeMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | MA | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | MA | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | MA | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | MA | |||||
| Mistral Small | MA | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | MA | MA | MA | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | MA | MA | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | MA | |||||
| Kimi K2 | MA | MA | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | MA | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | MA | MA |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to approach with caution: Native clean rooms operated by major media platforms (e.g., Google Ads Data Hub, Amazon Marketing Cloud, Meta Advanced Analytics)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Walled Gardens: Google, Meta, Amazon—if most of your spend is there, but they limit cross-platform insights.” Grok 4.20 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Meta's history of data misuse is repeatedly cited as a reason to be cautious with its clean room offerings.” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“likely to be a free walled-garden option such as Google Ads Data Hub, Amazon Marketing Cloud, or Meta Advanced Analytics” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Google, Amazon, and Meta each run a clean room that costs nothing in licence fees” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Meta Advanced Analytics (currently in beta)” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Databricks requires data to live in Databricks storage or an accessible cloud bucket, which can add setup complexity” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · soft negative
“Strong for advanced analytics if you're in that ecosystem, but steeper learning curve for mid-market teams.” Grok 4.20 · direct prompt · soft negative
“more accessible than heavy engineering-heavy options like raw Databricks or AWS Clean Rooms” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Databricks Clean Rooms is generally the most flexible for mid-size companies needing cross-cloud, privacy-policy governed collaboration with full audit logs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prefer neutral, interoperable platforms (like Snowflake, Databricks, AWS Clean Rooms, InfoSum, or independent providers)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · first choice
“start with your primary Cloud Data Warehouse's native DCR (typically Snowflake DCR or Databricks Clean Rooms)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.