Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › GTM › GTM data and infrastructure › Consent › Osano vs CookieYes
Consent and privacy management · November 2026 Edition

Osano vs CookieYes

Eleven of fourteen models named Osano first on the direct prompt; zero named CookieYes. Osano was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and CookieYes by thirteen and Osano carries 49 labels and CookieYes 37, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Osano

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

CookieYes

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share29%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate10%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 13; printed, not drawn.
Labels4937A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Osano reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Usercentrics CMP was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Osano vs Cookiebot · Osano vs Usercentrics CMP · Osano vs iubenda

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the consent and privacy management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
OsanoFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCookieYes
Direct1101 against CookieYes
Paraphrase401 against Osano
Comparative00
Budget-constrained193 against Osano
Scale-constrained00
Negative111 against Osano · 2 against CookieYes
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Osano and CookieYes were named in the same answer fifty-one times, of the 103 answers naming Osano and the 103 naming CookieYes. In those answers CookieYes took the first choice thirteen times and Osano six.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Osano and CookieYes stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Osano CookieYes first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Osano on the left and CookieYes on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Osano and CookieYes stood in it.

Osano first, CookieYes an alternative

11 of 14 modelsCookieYes was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Osano alternatives: Cookiebot, Enzuzo
Gemini 3.5 FlashOsano alternatives: Didomi, Ketch, Usercentrics CMP
Perplexity SonarOsano alternatives: Cookiebot, Enzuzo, Usercentrics CMP
Mistral SmallOsano, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Enzuzo, OneTrust
DeepSeek V4 FlashOsano alternatives: Cookiebot, Ketch, Usercentrics CMP
Qwen 3.7 FlashOsano alternatives: Cookiebot, Usercentrics CMP, consentmanager
Kimi K2Osano alternatives: Ketch, Usercentrics CMP
GLM 4.7 FlashXOsano, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Cookiebot, Ketch
MiniMax M2.5Osano, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: CookieYes, Ketch, Secure Privacy
GPT-6 LunaOsano alternatives: OneTrust, Usercentrics CMP
Muse Glimmer 30BCookiebot, Osano, Usercentrics CMP alternatives: Ketch

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniUsercentrics CMP alternatives: CookieScript, CookieYes, Cookiebot, OneTrust
Grok 4.20Usercentrics CMP alternatives: CookieYes, OneTrust

Neither was named

1 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Llama 4 Maverickiubenda alternatives: Cookiebot, OneTrust, Usercentrics CMP, consentmanager

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
CookieYes leads by twenty-six points.
CookieYes30%#1 of 11
Osano4%#8 of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Osano leads at mid-market.
Osano29%#1 of 13
CookieYes16%#4 of 13
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Osano0%#6 of 9
CookieYes0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Osano

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“or Osano ($199/month) — they're overkill for a limited budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“it may be overkill unless you need US multi-state compliance—skip if truly budget-constrained” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · soft negative
“Others to watch (e.g., OneTrust, TrustArc, Osano): ... potential dark patterns in defaults” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Osano (Best Overall Balance of Power and Price) ... widely considered the top choice for mid-sized companies” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Top Pick: Osano ... hits the best balance of features, price, and protection for that segment” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Osano: Known for strict adherence to privacy laws and excellent legal templates.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · first choice

What the models said about CookieYes

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Too basic; built for small businesses and WordPress sites. Lacks DSAR, vendor governance” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · hard negative
“Frequent complaints about poor/slow customer support, bureaucratic processes, high costs” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · hard negative
“tools such as CookieYes may be fine for basic sites, but check support for GPC, IAB GPP, Google Consent Mode, TCF, multilingual regional rules” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“CookieYes is frequently recommended as the best overall budget choice.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is usually CookieYes. It has a free plan” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company managing website cookies, I'd start with CookieYes.” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Osano vs CookiebotOsano vs Usercentrics CMPOsano vs iubendaOsano vs EnzuzoOsano vs KetchOsano vs ComplianzCookiebot vs CookieYesUsercentrics CMP vs CookieYesCookieYes vs iubendaCookieYes vs EnzuzoCookieYes vs KetchCookieYes vs ComplianzAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full consent standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.