t0
Read the same way at every company size.
The standing depends on who is buying. Every model is asked the same questions for each company size.
myTransferPricing is first at 40%.
TPGenie is first at 21%. 0 of 14 models made it the first choice when asked directly.
Aibidia is first at 24%.
Why models recommend it
“Choose t0 by Supernomial if: You want to leverage AI to handle repetitive work, you value flexibility to build your own processes”Qwen 3.7 Flash · Comparative question · first choice
“t0 by Supernomial — Best Overall Value”DeepSeek V4 Flash · Budget-constrained question · first choice
“Choose TPGenie / t0 by Supernomial / Astraea TP Suite if you want an AI-native, generative documentation and research workflow.”Muse Glimmer 30B · Direct question · alternative
“Choose t0 if you are looking for the latest technology to automate the drafting process via AI.”GLM 4.7 FlashX · Comparative question · alternative
What gives them pause
“only one review each for Integral, Reptune, and t0. That doesn't mean they're bad; it means star ratings tell you very little.”GPT-6 Luna · Negative question · warning
“It's more advanced and secure but might have a steeper learning curve or cost for pure mid-sized needs.”Grok 4.20 · Paraphrase question · warning
Also on the shortlist
The products named in the same answers as t0, over the 48 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.
| Product | Named together | Picked instead | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | 11 | View → | |
| 19 | 5 | View → | |
| 19 | 4 | View → | |
| 19 | 4 | View → | |
| 19 | 1 | View → | |
| 13 | 4 | View → | |
| 9 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 8 | 0 | View → | |
| 6 | 2 | View → |
What the models named instead of t0 →
A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.
How this is measured
Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.
Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.
Read the method →Sources returned with these answers
Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 48 of the 48 answers that named t0 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
No domain is on file for t0, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |