Gane Index

All indexesEvery index and its categories GTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations software ITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data software HRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning software FinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software

Claim your listing

Index › Finance › Products › ClearSight · November 2026 Edition

Telecom expense management · Named, not ranked

ClearSight

–Too few to rank

5/14Models named it

0First choices

0Warnings

November 2026 Edition · all company sizes counted.

Ranked inTelecom expense management #35 mid-market

What AI models recommend

Named, too few times to rank.

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share is stated. ClearSight has 5.

Why models recommend it

“Positioned for mid-market organizations with a focus on telecom expense management and telecom cost visibility”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Direct question · alternative

“It's best for mid-sized organizations that want a simple, AI-powered way to manage telecom expenses.”Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paraphrase question · alternative

What gives them pause

No model argued against it.

Also on the shortlist

The products named in the same answers as ClearSight, over the 7 answers that named it, and how often each was the first choice instead.

Product	Named together	Picked instead
Lightyear	7	0	View →
Brightfin	5	0	View →
Tangoe One Telecom	4	1	View →
ExpenseLogic	4	0	View →
Sakon	4	0	View →
vCom Solutions	3	2	View →
Mobil	3	0	View →
Motus	3	0	View →
Cimpl	2	1	View →
Calero	2	0	View →

A side-by-side page exists where both products are among a category's top eight.

How this is measured

Fourteen AI models from 12 labs are asked the same buying questions six ways, for three company sizes. Standings refresh every edition.

Gane sells AI visibility software. No company can pay to change a result.

Read the method →

Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages the answers that named ClearSight came back with. A fact about retrieval, not a cause of the answer.

Fourteen of the fourteen models returned a source list in this edition: five return the pages they cited and nine the search results they consulted. These counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named ClearSight and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

uplandsoftware.com7

capterra.com5

softwareadvice.com5

tailwindvoiceanddata.com5

valicomtech.com4

g2.com3

getapp.com3

guideflow.com3

sourceforge.net3

use.expensify.com3

No domain is on file for ClearSight, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

uplandsoftware.com/cimpl/technology-expense-management/best-telecom-expense-management-sof7

capterra.com/resources/best-telecom-expense-management-software-review-analysis5

tailwindvoiceanddata.com/blog/the-7-best-telecom-expense-management-companies-in-20265

softwareadvice.com/telecom-expense-management4

valicomtech.com/blog/10-best-telecom-expense-management-software-in-20264

getapp.com/it-communications-software/telecom-expense-management3

guideflow.com/blog/telecom-expense-software3

use.expensify.com/resource-center/guides/telecom-expense-management-solutions3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

By model

How each model answered on ClearSight across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.20	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1