Cash flow forecasting · November 2026 Edition
Agicap vs Centime
Three of fourteen models named Agicap first on the direct prompt; two named Centime. Agicap was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Centime by nine and Agicap carries 35 labels and Centime 12, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in four categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
First-choice share17%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate3%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 22; printed, not drawn.
Labels3512A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Agicap reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Prophix One was named alongside these two in twelve of the fourteen direct answers. Agicap vs Upflow · Agicap vs Pulse · Agicap vs Drivetrain
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cash flow forecasting page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
AgicapFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCentime
Direct32
Paraphrase62
Comparative10
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Agicap
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Agicap and Centime stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.20 | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | |||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
Agicap Centime first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Agicap on the left and Centime on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Agicap and Centime stood in it.
Agicap first, Centime an alternative
3 of 14 modelsCentime was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.DeepSeek V4 FlashAgicap alternatives: Centime, Chaser, Prophix One, Tesorio, Upflow
Kimi K2Agicap, Drivetrain alternatives: Chaser, Cube, Prophix One, Vena
GPT-6 LunaAgicap alternatives: Centime, Prophix One, Tesorio
Centime first, Agicap an alternative
2 of 14 modelsAgicap was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Gemini 3.5 FlashCentime, Tesorio alternatives: Abacum, Agicap, Cube, Trovata
MiniMax M2.5Centime, Upflow alternatives: Prophix One, Vena
Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniKyriba alternatives: Agicap, Anaplan, Drivetrain
Grok 4.20Drivetrain alternatives: Agicap, Cash Flow Frog, CashAnalytics, Float, Prophix One, Vena
GLM 4.7 FlashXDrivetrain alternatives: Agicap, Float, Prophix One, Vena
Muse Glimmer 30BDrivetrain, Prophix One alternatives: Abacum, Agicap, Chaser, Tesorio, Trovata, Upflow, Vena
Neither was named
5 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Prophix One alternatives: Chaser, Cube, Tesorio, Trovata
Perplexity SonarUpflow alternatives: Chaser, Prophix One, Tesorio
Mistral SmallProphix One, Upflow alternatives: Chaser, Tesorio
Llama 4 MaverickChaser alternatives: Prophix One, Upflow, Vena
Qwen 3.7 FlashTesorio, Upflow alternatives: Prophix One, Trovata, Vena
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Agicap0%#– of 11Centime0%#– of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
Centime is not named for this buyer.
Agicap0%#14 of 16Centime—not namedWhat the models said about Agicap
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Agicap, which is only limited to treasury management so users require additional software for their planning and budgeting requirements” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Agicap takes the top spot for Finance teams, and forecasts future cash positions to anticipate financing needs.” Muse Glimmer 30B · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Agicap if the main need is a dependable, rolling cash forecast and liquidity visibility” GPT-6 Luna · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Centime
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Tesorio or Centime | Forecasts cash based on actual buyer payment trends, not due dates.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Centime and Tesorio are the top choices due to their strong integration with common ERPs” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Centime and Upflow stand out as purpose-built for this segment” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Also compared
Agicap vs UpflowAgicap vs PulseAgicap vs DrivetrainAgicap vs Cash Flow FrogAgicap vs Prophix OneAgicap vs TesorioUpflow vs CentimePulse vs CentimeDrivetrain vs CentimeCash Flow Frog vs CentimeProphix One vs CentimeCentime vs TesorioAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full cash flow forecasting standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.