Seven of fourteen models named Bloomberg Tax Provision first on the direct prompt; one named Avalara. Bloomberg Tax Provision was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Avalara by eleven and Bloomberg Tax Provision carries 42 labels and Avalara 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in four categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate tax provision page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Bloomberg Tax Provision and Avalara were named in the same answer twenty-five times, of the 103 answers naming Bloomberg Tax Provision and the 78 naming Avalara. In those answers Avalara took the first choice one time and Bloomberg Tax Provision five.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Avoid These If Budget-Constrained - Bloomberg Tax Provision — very powerful, but pricing is quote-only and typically $30K–$150K/year.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: ONESOURCE, Bloomberg, or Longview ... often not viable under $10k–$20k/year.” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“some tax provision tools that should be avoided or used with caution include: 1. Bloomberg Tax Provision” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative
“Highly regarded for mid-market and mid-tier companies; strong ASC 740 engine, clean user interface, and relatively fast implementation.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Start with Bloomberg Tax Provision if you're a true mid-market company focused on ASC 740 accuracy with minimal complexity.” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
“Bloomberg Tax is a tax management and automation software suite supporting corporate tax research, calculation, and compliance” Claude Haiku 4.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avalara should generally not be treated as a primary ASC 740 provision tool” Perplexity Sonar · comparative prompt · hard negative
“it's not primarily a corporate income tax compliance tool... it shouldn't be your primary income tax compliance system” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Cons: Primarily focused on indirect tax, not corporate income tax.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“I recommend Avalara as the top choice for comprehensive income tax compliance and related regulatory needs” Grok 4.20 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Avalara would be my primary recommendation because it specifically addresses B2B compliance needs” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision and Avalara are the top choices” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.