Corefy vs Checkout.com
One of fourteen models named Corefy first on the direct prompt; one named Checkout.com. Corefy was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Checkout.com by seven and Corefy carries 16 labels and Checkout.com 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the payment orchestration platforms page.
By framing
CorefyFirst choices, of fourteen modelsCheckout.com
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Corefy and Checkout.com were named in the same answer thirteen times, of the 59 answers naming Corefy and the 43 naming Checkout.com. In those answers Checkout.com took the first choice zero times and Corefy zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | |||||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.20 | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | |
Corefy Checkout.com first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Corefy on the left and Checkout.com on the right.The direct prompt
Corefy first, Checkout.com not the choice
1 of 14 modelsCheckout.com was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Checkout.com first, Corefy not the choice
1 of 14 modelsCorefy was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
4 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Corefy6%#5 of 13Checkout.com0%#12 of 13What the models said about Corefy
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid overbuying. Deep routing and white-label control can create substantial implementation and governance work” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“Corefy is the strongest general recommendation for a mid-market B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Corefy stands out as a top choice” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation: Corefy” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
What the models said about Checkout.com
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Checkout.com has limitations in true multi-PSP neutrality, with flexibility declining when attempting to treat multiple providers equally” Claude Haiku 4.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Pricing is opaque and negotiated manually... the overhead of managing Checkout.com isn't worth the savings” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“The most modern, developer-friendly alternative to Adyen.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“While often used as gateways, they have evolved into platforms offering strong orchestration-like features” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
“a comprehensive PSP with built-in orchestration (Adyen, Checkout.com) may be better” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.