Three of fourteen models named Finix first on the direct prompt; zero named Square. Finix was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Square by seven and Finix carries 44 labels and Square 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in seven categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the embedded payments platforms page.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Explicitly called out in budget analysis as "Avoid for tight budgets: Finix ($250+/mo)"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · hard negative
“Switch to a custom PayFac-as-a-Service (like Finix or Payrix) only once your platform processes >$10M+ in gross payment volume per year” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“usually better once processing volume is high enough to justify custom pricing and additional integration work” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“I'd start with Finix. For a mid-sized company, it looks like a good balance of payment control and monetization options” GPT-6 Luna · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Finix is the most frequently recommended fit for SaaS platforms and marketplaces embedding payments” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Finix offers the best balance of control, compliance handling, and pricing transparency” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Weaker for pure software-embedded/ISV use cases—better suited for hardware-integrated retail.” Grok 4.20 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Large processors like Stripe, PayPal, and Square often operate under an "aggregator" model” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · soft negative
“Very small / in-person + online, no dev resources: Square Free plan.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“they build a secondary backup processor (like Square or Adyen) ready to go live if Stripe locks them out” Qwen 3.7 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
“Square/TBD, or Mollie (depending on geography) tend to have far better support infrastructure” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.