Gane Index
All indexesEvery index and its categoriesGTMMarketing, sales, customer and revenue operations softwareITSecurity, IT operations, cloud, developer and data softwareHRHR, payroll, recruiting, performance and learning softwareFinanceAccounting, planning, spend, billing and treasury software
Claim your listing
Index › Finance › Accounting and close › Disclosure reporting › Certent Disclosure Management vs IRIS CARBON
SEC and disclosure reporting · November 2026 Edition

Certent Disclosure Management vs IRIS CARBON

Five of fourteen models named Certent Disclosure Management first on the direct prompt; one named IRIS CARBON. Certent Disclosure Management was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and IRIS CARBON by thirteen and Certent Disclosure Management carries 58 labels and IRIS CARBON 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Certent Disclosure Management

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

IRIS CARBON

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share27%16%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%2%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#4A position in a field of 6; printed, not drawn.
Labels5842A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Certent Disclosure Management reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.DFIN ActiveDisclosure was named alongside these two in thirteen of the fourteen direct answers. Certent Disclosure Management vs Workiva · Certent Disclosure Management vs DFIN ActiveDisclosure · Workiva vs IRIS CARBON

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEC and disclosure reporting page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Certent Disclosure ManagementFirst choices, of fourteen modelsIRIS CARBON
Direct511 against Certent Disclosure Management
Paraphrase31
Comparative00
Budget-constrained981 against IRIS CARBON
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Certent Disclosure Management and IRIS CARBON were named in the same answer 116 times, of the 169 answers naming Certent Disclosure Management and the 126 naming IRIS CARBON. In those answers IRIS CARBON took the first choice nine times and Certent Disclosure Management eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Certent Disclosure Management and IRIS CARBON stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.20
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Certent Disclosure Management IRIS CARBON first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Certent Disclosure Management on the left and IRIS CARBON on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Certent Disclosure Management and IRIS CARBON stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
Muse Glimmer 30BCertent Disclosure Management, IRIS CARBON alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure

Certent Disclosure Management first, IRIS CARBON an alternative

4 of 14 modelsIRIS CARBON was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Certent Disclosure Management alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure, IRIS CARBON
Grok 4.20Certent Disclosure Management alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure, IRIS CARBON, Workiva
DeepSeek V4 FlashCertent Disclosure Management, Workiva alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure, Toppan Merrill Bridge
Qwen 3.7 FlashCertent Disclosure Management alternatives: Toppan Merrill Bridge, Workiva

Neither was the first choice, one was named

5 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashDFIN ActiveDisclosure alternatives: Certent Disclosure Management, Toppan Merrill Bridge, Workiva
Perplexity SonarDFIN ActiveDisclosure alternatives: Certent Disclosure Management, Workiva
Mistral SmallWorkiva alternatives: Certent Disclosure Management, DFIN ActiveDisclosure, IRIS CARBON
Kimi K2DFIN ActiveDisclosure alternatives: Certent Disclosure Management
GLM 4.7 FlashXDFIN ActiveDisclosure alternatives: Certent Disclosure Management, Workiva

Neither was named

4 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniWorkiva alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure, Toppan Merrill Bridge
Llama 4 MaverickDFIN ActiveDisclosure, Workiva
MiniMax M2.5Workiva alternatives: DFIN ActiveDisclosure, EdgarAgents
GPT-6 LunaDFIN ActiveDisclosure alternatives: Workiva

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Certent Disclosure Management leads by eight points.
Certent Disclosure Management36%#1 of 5
IRIS CARBON29%#2 of 5
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Certent Disclosure Management leads by eleven points.
Certent Disclosure Management27%#1 of 6
IRIS CARBON16%#4 of 6
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Certent Disclosure Management0%#4 of 9
IRIS CARBON0%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Certent Disclosure Management

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Cons: Less comprehensive feature set than Workiva” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · soft negative
“For most small companies with limited budgets, Certent Disclosure Management or IRIS CARBON offer the best balance of functionality and affordability” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Certent Disclosure Management, owned by insightsoftware, is the established cost-conscious alternative to Workiva, best fitting smaller reporting companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Choose Certent Disclosure Management / IRIS CARBON if you want governed 10-K/10-Q/8-K and proxy filing with native iXBRL... the lowest total cost” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about IRIS CARBON

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Worth pricing for a value-oriented option, though reported list pricing starts around $25,000.” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Certent Disclosure Management / IRIS CARBON if you want governed 10-K/10-Q/8-K and proxy filing with native iXBRL” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“is Certent Disclosure Management or IRIS CARBON, as they deliver the essential workflow at a fraction of the cost” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“Certent Disclosure Management and IRIS CARBON deliver the essential workflow at a fraction of the leader's cost.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared
Certent Disclosure Management vs WorkivaCertent Disclosure Management vs DFIN ActiveDisclosureWorkiva vs IRIS CARBONDFIN ActiveDisclosure vs IRIS CARBONAll six head-to-head pages and the full disclosure reporting standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.