Eight of fourteen models named Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition first on the direct prompt; four named Maxio. Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and Maxio by thirteen and Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition carries 46 labels and Maxio 41, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eight categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the revenue recognition page.
Across every category in the November 2026 Edition, Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition and Maxio were named in the same answer sixty-eight times, of the 111 answers naming Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition and the 160 naming Maxio. In those answers Maxio took the first choice sixteen times and Sage Intacct Revenue Recognition ten.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.20 | ||||||
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | ||||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | ||||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | ||||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | ||||||
| GPT-6 Luna | ||||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B |
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Avoid premium tools like Chargebee RevRec (~$7K+/month), Zuora, or Sage Intacct unless scaling rapidly” Grok 4.20 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Enterprise solutions like Zuora, NetSuite, or Sage Intacct” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Built for businesses with $5M+ revenue (quote-based pricing, generally not budget-friendly)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Sage Intacct is consistently positioned as the mid-market depth leader for subscription and multi-element contracts.” Muse Glimmer 30B · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best For: Mid-market finance teams that want automated ASC 606 compliance native inside their core accounting GL” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Sage Intacct or Maxio would be the strongest starting points” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“followed closely by Maxio (for implementation/imaturity issues)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Maxio, but its Grow plan starts at $599/month, so it may not suit a tight budget” GPT-6 Luna · budget prompt · soft negative
“its entry price is around $599/month, making it less suitable for a tight budget” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · soft negative
“Maxio combines unified revenue recognition and billing for SaaS businesses following the merger of Chargify and SaaSOptics.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“It's best for B2B SaaS mid-market that wants billing, collections and a standard ASC 606 / IFRS 15 schedule in one vendor” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Maxio and QuickBooks Online are the most frequently recommended for small businesses with limited budgets” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.