# Veracode Security Labs: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 23 judge labels across 1 category by 12 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/veracode-security-labs

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Secure code training](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/secure-code-training/index.md) | 2% | 10 | 35% | 23 |

## What the models said for it

- "SANS and Veracode are both excellent choices" (Mistral Small, Secure code training)
- "Best For: Teams already standardized on Veracode scanning who want training that aligns with their existing tooling." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Secure code training)
- "Best for: Existing Veracode customers wanting training that complements their scanning and remediation workflows." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Secure code training)
- "Choose Veracode Security Labs or Checkmarx Codebashing if your organization already uses Veracode or Checkmarx" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Secure code training)

## And against it

- "Paid enterprise platforms like Secure Code Warrior, Veracode Security Labs, or Immersive Labs are highly rated for depth and integration but often start at thousands of dollars annually" (Grok 4.20, Secure code training)
- "Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction" (Llama 4 Maverick, Secure code training)
- "they can feel more bolted-on than dedicated platforms like SCW, and pricing may be higher for mid-market" (Grok 4.20, Secure code training)
- "Described as a "high-cost, high-friction" option rather than a quality issue per se." (Mistral Small, Secure code training)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode Security Labs, from 64 of the 69 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 33
- sourceforge.net: 33
- gane.ai/index: 32
- ransomleak.com: 30
- veracode.com: 29 (its own site)
- reddit.com: 28
- blog.secureflag.com: 25
- securityjourney.com: 25
- securecodewarrior.com: 23
- guideflow.com: 22

### Pages cited

- https://ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-2026: 29
- https://veracode.com/developers/training: 27
- https://blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms: 23
- https://guideflow.com/blog/application-security-training: 22
- https://reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1ip5cke/what_platform_do_you_use_to_train_developers_on: 22
- https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/secure-code-training/enterprise: 20
- https://comparitech.com/net-admin/best-secure-code-training-tools: 17
- https://topbusinesssoftware.com/categories/secure-code-training: 16

## In its own words

What Veracode Security Labs's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: As a Security Labs learner, you are assigned labs or lessons through campaigns. A campaign has a set of related lessons. (https://docs.veracode.com/r/Learn_Security_Labs)
- For: a Security Labs learner (https://docs.veracode.com/r/Learn_Security_Labs)

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.
