# Veracode SCA alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 244 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where Veracode SCA holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/veracode-sca/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Snyk Open Source: 72
- Trivy: 37
- Sonatype Lifecycle: 25
- OWASP Dependency-Check: 15
- OWASP Dependency-Track: 12
- GitHub Dependabot: 11

## Software composition analysis

**Small business**: 84 of 84 answers did not name Veracode SCA.

- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 36 of those 84
- Trivy: first choice in 17 of those 84
- OWASP Dependency-Check: first choice in 10 of those 84
- GitHub Dependabot: first choice in 7 of those 84
- OSV-Scanner: first choice in 5 of those 84
- Aikido Security: first choice in 2 of those 84
- FOSSA: first choice in 1 of those 84
- GitHub Advanced Security: first choice in 1 of those 84

**Mid-market**: 82 of 84 answers did not name Veracode SCA (Veracode SCA is #19 of 19 at 0%).

- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 26 of those 82
- Trivy: first choice in 17 of those 82
- OWASP Dependency-Check: first choice in 5 of those 82
- GitHub Dependabot: first choice in 4 of those 82
- Mend.io – Mend SCA: first choice in 4 of those 82
- OWASP Dependency-Track: first choice in 3 of those 82
- Sonatype Lifecycle: first choice in 2 of those 82
- Aikido Security: first choice in 1 of those 82

**Enterprise**: 78 of 84 answers did not name Veracode SCA (Veracode SCA is #13 of 14 at 0%).

- Sonatype Lifecycle: first choice in 23 of those 78
- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 10 of those 78
- Black Duck: first choice in 9 of those 78
- OWASP Dependency-Track: first choice in 9 of those 78
- Mend.io – Mend SCA: first choice in 5 of those 78
- OSV-Scanner: first choice in 3 of those 78
- Trivy: first choice in 3 of those 78
- Aikido Security: first choice in 1 of those 78

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.