# Teramind: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 48 judge labels across 1 category by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/teramind

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Insider risk management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/insider-risk-management/index.md) | 14% | 2 | 21% | 48 |

## What the models said for it

- "the platforms that are most consistently called out for mid-market scale, price transparency and low analyst overhead are Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and Teramind" (Muse Glimmer 30B, Insider risk)
- "If you need an affordable, ready-to-use software solution: Go with Teramind or ActivTrak." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Insider risk)
- "I'd recommend starting with Code42 Incydr or Teramind based on your priorities" (MiniMax M2.5, Insider risk)
- "the best insider threat platform for a mid-sized B2B company would be Teramind" (Llama 4 Maverick, Insider risk)

## And against it

- "Tools/Types to Approach with High Caution or Avoid: Overly Surveillance-Heavy Tools (e.g., Teramind, Veriato, some legacy user activity monitoring like Proofpoint ObserveIT)" (Muse Glimmer 30B, Insider risk)
- "Flagged for performance issues and limited scalability in large enterprise environments... recommend against its use for large-scale deployments" (Mistral Small, Insider risk)
- "Categories to Avoid Entirely ... Teramind" (Kimi K2, Insider risk)
- "Criticisms include heavy surveillance features that raise privacy/ethical flags; better for explicit monitoring but avoid if your focus is behavioral risk without invasiveness." (Grok 4.20, Insider risk)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Teramind, from 137 of the 142 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- insiderisk.io: 99
- microsoft.com: 57
- rankite.com: 54
- companionlink.com: 50
- jazz.security: 48
- dtex.ai: 42
- gane.ai/index: 37
- guptadeepak.com: 35
- learn.microsoft.com: 33
- g2.com: 32

### Pages cited

- https://insiderisk.io/research/best-insider-risk-management-tools-2026: 72
- https://rankite.com/blog/best-insider-threat-software: 51
- https://companionlink.com/blog/2026/10/best-employee-monitoring-software-for-insider-threat-detection: 47
- https://guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-insider-threat-management-tools-2026: 35
- https://microsoft.com/en/security/small-medium-business/microsoft-purview-suite-business-premium: 34
- https://insiderisk.io/research/insider-threat-detection-solutions-technologies-2025: 31
- https://venn.com/learn/insider-threats/insider-threat-software: 30
- https://dtex.ai/knowledge-base/insider-risk-monitoring-tools-a-2026-comparison-guide: 27

## In its own words

What Teramind's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Workforce Analytics & Insider Risk Platform (https://teramind.co/)
- For: CISOs, HR, executives, security and HR teams (https://teramind.co/)
- Free plan or trial: Start Free Trial (https://teramind.co/)
- Customers named: Western Reserve, VIVA, Marble Box, BRMS, Peak Support

## What it publishes

Every page teramind.co exposes, read 2026-09-29: 1188 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 168 pages, 21 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- case study: 18 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 8 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-01-19
- comparison: 53 pages, 6 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-21
- glossary or explainer: 12 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-07-12
- podcast or video: 8 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-14
- news or press: 12 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Workforce planning analytics https://www.teramind.co/blog/workforce-planning-analytics
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Pharma biotech insider risk https://www.teramind.co/blog/pharma-biotech-insider-risk
- Recent: 2026-09-22 blog: Workforce planning metrics https://www.teramind.co/blog/workforce-planning-metrics
- Recent: 2026-09-21 comparison: Dtex vs teramind https://www.teramind.co/blog/dtex-vs-teramind
- Recent: 2026-09-17 comparison: Proofpoint vs teramind https://www.teramind.co/blog/proofpoint-vs-teramind
- Recent: 2026-09-15 blog: Legal dlp https://www.teramind.co/blog/legal-dlp

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.