# Snyk Code: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 50 judge labels across 1 category by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/snyk-code

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Static application security testing](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/static-application-security-testing/index.md) | 4% | 4 | 6% | 50 |

## What the models said for it

- "Choose Snyk or Semgrep if your priority is developer velocity, minimal false positives, fast PR feedback, and simple setup." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, SAST)
- "I'd recommend starting with SonarQube or Snyk Code due to their balance of features, pricing, and ease of use" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, SAST)
- "Snyk Code — *Best Overall Platform for Mid-Market B2B*" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, SAST)
- "Snyk Code brings AI\u2011assisted detection and auto\u2011fixes into the mix, ideal for teams already using Snyk\u2019s ecosystem." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, SAST)

## And against it

- "pricing is higher (~$98/user/month) and it's more focused on SCA and developer workflows than on comprehensive code quality" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, SAST)
- "delivers fast in-IDE feedback, but findings aren't verified for exploitability" (Claude Haiku 4.5, SAST)
- "Great IDE integration, but the free tier is limited" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, SAST)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Snyk Code, from 107 of the 131 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- safeguard.sh: 50
- checkmarx.com: 49
- appsecsanta.com: 47
- dev.to: 46
- g2.com: 26
- securityboulevard.com: 25
- startupstash.com: 25
- aikido.dev: 24
- gane.ai/index: 23
- fluidattacks.com: 21

### Pages cited

- https://checkmarx.com/learn/sast/open-source-vs-premium-sast-tools: 37
- https://dev.to/rahulxsingh/i-reviewed-32-sast-tools-the-ones-worth-using-283e: 35
- https://appsecsanta.com/sast-tools: 29
- https://startupstash.com/best-sast-tools: 24
- https://fluidattacks.com/blog/top-10-sast-tools: 21
- https://upwind.io/glossary/best-sast-tools-static-code-scanners-compared: 21
- https://deepsource.com/resources/static-analysis-tools: 20
- https://appsecsanta.com/sast-tools/enterprise-sast-tools: 18

## In its own words

What Snyk Code's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: We've improved Snyk Code analysis for the .NET, PHP, Python, Go, and Scala ecosystems. These updates increase coverage and analysis quality, providing broader and more accurate static application security testing (SAST) support. (https://updates.snyk.io/snyk-code-update)
- For: Customers using .NET (C# and VB) codebases and PHP codebases (https://updates.snyk.io/snyk-code-june-update)

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.