# SAFE Security: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 30 judge labels across 2 categories by 12 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/safe-security

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Cyber risk quantification](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/cyber-risk-quantification/index.md) | 6% | 5 | 38% | 29 |
| [Third-party risk management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/third-party-risk-management/index.md) | 0% | 85 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "Strongest for FAIR methodology, broad security-tool integrations, and continuous quantification" (Perplexity Sonar, Cyber risk quant)
- "my default recommendation for a mid-sized B2B company would be: 1) Safe Security" (GPT-5.4 mini, Cyber risk quant)
- "I recommend starting with CyberSaint CyberStrong or Safe Security" (Kimi K2, Cyber risk quant)
- "Clear leader with 56% first-choice share among enterprise buyers" (MiniMax M2.5, Cyber risk quant)

## And against it

- "Avoid enterprise tools like SAFE Security, Axio, or Balbix if budget is tight" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Cyber risk quant)
- "Expensive, fully licensed FAIR platforms (like early versions of RiskLens or SAFE Security) for organizations that don’t have dedicated risk analysts." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Cyber risk quant)
- "Traditional, enterprise-grade CRQ platforms (e.g., Safe Security (SAFE One), Kovrr, Axio) - generally not recommended for B2B SMBs." (Llama 4 Maverick, Cyber risk quant)
- "Enterprise tools like Safe Security can be overkill (and overpriced) if you don't have a large, complex attack surface." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Cyber risk quant)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAFE Security, from 112 of the 117 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 67
- gane.ai/index: 52
- securityboulevard.com: 45
- github.com: 42
- kovrr.com: 40
- techtarget.com: 35
- safe.security: 32 (its own site)
- riskpublishing.com: 31
- cybersaint.io: 26
- corecyber.io: 25

### Pages cited

- https://g2.com/categories/cyber-risk-quantification-crq-tools: 60
- https://techtarget.com/news/Cyber-risk-quantification-challenges-and-tools-that-can-help/836979: 32
- https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/cyber-risk-quantification/smb: 27
- https://github.com/Jagan96404/Cyber-Risk-Quantification: 26
- https://corecyber.io/: 25
- https://cyberdb.co/what-are-the-best-platforms-for-quantifying-cyber-risk: 25
- https://cyberpress.org/crq-tools-review: 25
- https://riskpublishing.com/best-cyber-risk-quantification-platforms-compar: 23

## In its own words

What SAFE Security's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Autonomous Cyber Risk Management (https://safe.security/)
- For: security teams (https://safe.security/)
- Integrations claimed: 100 (https://safe.security/customers)
- Certifications: TX-RAMP, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, SOC 3, ISO 9001
- Customers named: Victoria’s Secret & Co., T-Mobile, Instacart, San Francisco Health Plan, Carvana, Booz Allen Hamilton, Aboitiz Power, OB Hospitalist Group

## What it publishes

Every page safe.security exposes, read 2026-10-05: 1080 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 513 pages, 7 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-10-02
- case study: 19 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-08
- webinar or virtual event: 27 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-05-20
- conference or event: 12 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-21
- report or ebook: 60 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-23
- comparison: 26 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-11
- template or tool: 13 pages, 9 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-25
- glossary or explainer: 246 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-08-26
- podcast or video: 33 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-11
- news or press: 55 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-05-28
- Recent: 2026-10-02 blog: Manufacturer vendor risk assessment automation https://safe.security/resources/blog/manufacturer-vendor-risk-assessment-automation
- Recent: 2026-10-02 blog: Cve 2026 34486 apache tomcat encryptinterceptor bypass to remote code execution https://safe.security/resources/blog/cve-2026-34486-apache-tomcat-encryptinterceptor-bypass-to-remote-code-execution
- Recent: 2026-10-01 blog: This Week’s CVE Priorities: Citrix, Check Point, F5, Cisco, and PeopleSoft Under Active Exploitation https://safe.security/resources/blog/this-weeks-cve-priorities-citrix-check-point-f5-cisco-and-peoplesoft-under-active-exploitation
- Recent: 2026-09-30 blog: No nonsense guide to tprm in 2026 book https://safe.security/resources/no-nonsense-guide-to-tprm-in-2026-book
- Recent: 2026-09-30 blog: CVE-2026-82329 | JFrog Artifactory Blank-Join-Key Authentication Bypass (Unauthenticated Admin Takeover) https://safe.security/resources/blog/jfrog-artifactory-authentication-bypass
- Recent: 2026-09-30 blog: Cve 2026 49049 joomshaper helix3 joomla unauthenticated arbitrary json file write https://safe.security/resources/blog/cve-2026-49049-joomshaper-helix3-joomla-unauthenticated-arbitrary-json-file-write

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.