# Read.AI: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 4 judge labels across 1 category by 4 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/read-ai

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Enterprise AI assistants](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/enterprise-ai-assistants/index.md) | 0% | 148 | 100% | 4 |

## And against it

- "Rated as high-risk for cybersecurity in reports; avoid in boardrooms or client calls" (Grok 4.20, Enterprise AI)
- "Unvetted meeting transcription tools like Read.ai and Otter.ai" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Enterprise AI)
- "Display AI-powered meeting assistant software, like Read.AI, faces significant security and privacy threats" (Muse Glimmer 30B, Enterprise AI)
- "Be Wary: AI Meeting Assistants ... makes them inherently high-risk if not deployed with encryption" (Kimi K2, Enterprise AI)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Read.AI, from 7 of the 7 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- dl.acm.org: 7
- microsoft.com: 6
- flexera.com: 5
- akamai.com: 4
- jdsupra.com: 3
- support.read.ai: 3 (its own site)
- adminit.ucdavis.edu: 2
- aricoma.com: 2
- cxtoday.com: 2
- github.com: 2

### Pages cited

- https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3759023.3759105: 6
- https://microsoft.com/en-us/security/security-insider/emerging-trends/ai-security-guide: 6
- https://flexera.com/blog/ai/enterprise-ai-governance-guide: 5
- https://akamai.com/site/en/documents/state-of-the-internet/2026/enterprise-ai-risk-report.pdf: 4
- https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3759023.3759105: 3
- https://adminit.ucdavis.edu/tech-tips/readai: 2
- https://aricoma.com/solutions/enterprise-applications/artificial-intelligence-and-big-data/ai-assistants-for-business-applications/faq-ai-assistants-in-enterprises-security-data-and-governance: 2
- https://cxtoday.com/ai-security-and-customer-data-risks-feature-in-big-tech-results: 2

## What it publishes

Every page read.ai exposes, read 2026-09-29: 3089 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 383 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- conference or event: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- report or ebook: 5 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- comparison: 50 pages, 10 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-07-04
- glossary or explainer: 16 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-05-26
- podcast or video: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fathom vs fireflies which is right for your team https://www.read.ai/articles/fathom-vs-fireflies-which-is-right-for-your-team
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fathom vs fireflies which is right for your team https://www.read.ai/hi/articles/fathom-vs-fireflies-which-is-right-for-your-team
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fathom vs otter side by side comparison https://www.read.ai/hi/articles/fathom-vs-otter-side-by-side-comparison
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fathom vs otter side by side comparison https://www.read.ai/articles/fathom-vs-otter-side-by-side-comparison
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fireflies ai alternatives worth considering https://www.read.ai/hi/articles/fireflies-ai-alternatives-worth-considering
- Recent: 2026-07-04 comparison: Fireflies ai alternatives worth considering https://www.read.ai/articles/fireflies-ai-alternatives-worth-considering

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.