# Radiant Security: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 17 judge labels across 2 categories by 10 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/radiant-security

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AI SOC agents](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/ai-soc-agents/index.md) | 2% | 8 | 6% | 16 |
| [AI security platforms](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/security/ai-security-platforms/index.md) | 0% | 163 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "It's the most purpose-built AI SOC platform for the mid-market on this list" (Claude Haiku 4.5, AI SOC agents)
- "starts at approximately $1,188/year with flat-rate pricing for growing teams, making it one of the most affordable options" (Claude Haiku 4.5, AI SOC agents)
- "agentic triage that integrates with existing SIEM/EDR, designed for augmentation without rip-and-replace" (Muse Glimmer 30B, AI SOC agents)
- "Radiant Security — best for reducing SIEM cost and alert noise:" (Perplexity Sonar, AI SOC agents)

## And against it

- "Older or acquired players (e.g., Radiant Security's tech now under Cribl) have faded as standalone options." (Grok 4.20, AI SOC agents)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Radiant Security, from 36 of the 36 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- underdefense.com: 29
- github.com: 19
- intezer.com: 19
- stellarcyber.ai: 17
- gane.ai/index: 16
- g2.com: 14
- securityboulevard.com: 14
- startupstash.com: 12
- conifers.ai: 11
- d3security.com: 11

### Pages cited

- https://underdefense.com/blog/agentic-soc-platforms: 16
- https://underdefense.com/blog/most-affordable-ai-soc-platforms: 12
- https://conifers.ai/blog/top-ai-soc-agents: 11
- https://startupstash.com/best-ai-soc-tools: 11
- https://underdefense.com/blog/ai-soc-for-smb: 10
- https://github.com/volod-k/agentic-ai-soc-knowledge-base/blob/main/research/how-to-evaluate-vendors/best-agentic-soc-platforms.md: 8
- https://reliaquest.com/cyber-knowledge/ai-soc-tools: 8
- https://intezer.com/guides/ai-soc/how-to-compare-agentic-soc-platforms: 7

## What it publishes

Every page radiantsecurity.ai exposes, read 2026-10-05: 9 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.
