# ProM alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 241 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where ProM holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/prom/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: 67
- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: 41
- Apromore: 34
- Microsoft Power Automate: 14
- Fluxicon Disco: 8
- UiPath Process Mining: 7

## Process mining

**Small business**: 79 of 84 answers did not name ProM.

- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: first choice in 20 of those 79
- Apromore: first choice in 18 of those 79
- Microsoft Power Automate: first choice in 10 of those 79
- Fluxicon Disco: first choice in 8 of those 79
- ProcessMind: first choice in 4 of those 79
- process.science: first choice in 4 of those 79
- Disco: first choice in 3 of those 79
- Mindzie: first choice in 2 of those 79

**Mid-market**: 78 of 84 answers did not name ProM (ProM is #11 of 11 at 0%).

- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: first choice in 16 of those 78
- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: first choice in 14 of those 78
- Apromore: first choice in 13 of those 78
- UiPath Process Mining: first choice in 5 of those 78
- Mindzie: first choice in 3 of those 78
- Microsoft Power Automate: first choice in 2 of those 78
- PM4Py: first choice in 2 of those 78
- ABBYY Timeline: first choice in 1 of those 78

**Enterprise**: 84 of 84 answers did not name ProM.

- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: first choice in 51 of those 84
- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: first choice in 7 of those 84
- Apromore: first choice in 3 of those 84
- IBM Process Mining: first choice in 2 of those 84
- Microsoft Power Automate: first choice in 2 of those 84
- UiPath Process Mining: first choice in 2 of those 84
- SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: first choice in 1 of those 84

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.