# Kofax: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 9 judge labels across 2 categories by 6 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/kofax

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Intelligent document processing](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/index.md) | 0% | 121 | 80% | 5 |
| [Robotic process automation](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/robotic-process-automation/index.md) | 0% | 60 | 50% | 4 |

## And against it

- "Legacy or smaller tools (e.g., older versions of WorkFusion, Kofax...) often amplify security risks" (Grok 4.20, RPA)
- "Legacy platforms (or older, legacy deployments of established vendors like older versions of Kofax/Tungsten Automation or traditional ABBYY FlexiCapture setups) can be powerful for predictable, high-volume fixed forms" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Document processing)
- "Implementation Costs: These are not "plug-and-play." Implementing Kofax or ABBYY often requires hundreds of hours of professional services" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Document processing)
- "Kofax/Tungsten might not be the best fit... recent private equity ownership can sometimes signal higher costs" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, RPA)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kofax, from 21 of the 27 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 7
- research.isg-one.com: 7
- ciopages.com: 5
- peerspot.com: 5
- hypatos.ai: 4
- hyperscience.ai: 4
- abbyy.com: 3
- automationanywhere.com: 3
- avasant.com: 3
- grooper.com: 3

### Pages cited

- https://ciopages.com/buyer-guides/intelligent-document-processing: 5
- https://research.isg-one.com/buyers-guide/digital_technology/intelligent_document_processing/2024: 5
- https://avasant.com/report/intelligent-document-processing-platforms-2024-2025-radarview: 3
- https://grooper.com/blog_posts/intelligent-document-processing-vendors: 3
- https://guideflow.com/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software: 3
- https://kdan.com/blog/idp-solution-buyers-guide-smb-mid-market: 3
- https://research.isg-one.com/market-perspectives/isg-buyers-guide-for-intelligent-document-processing-classifies-and-rates-software-providers: 3
- https://research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-robotic-process-automation-2024/leaders: 3

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.