# Dynatrace: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 244 judge labels across 15 categories by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/dynatrace

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Application performance monitoring](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/application-performance-monitoring/index.md) | 4% | 5 | 38% | 52 |
| [AIOps platforms](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/aiops-platforms/index.md) | 2% | 10 | 28% | 40 |
| [Observability platforms](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/observability-platforms/index.md) | 0% | 71 | 42% | 45 |
| [Infrastructure monitoring](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/infrastructure-monitoring/index.md) | 0% | 12 | 23% | 43 |
| [Website and synthetic monitoring](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/website-and-synthetic-monitoring/index.md) | 0% | 17 | 20% | 20 |
| [Telemetry pipelines](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/telemetry-pipelines/index.md) | 0% | 105 | 67% | 9 |
| [Network monitoring and management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/network/network-monitoring-and-management/index.md) | 0% | 15 | 12% | 8 |
| [Data quality and observability](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/data-quality-and-observability/index.md) | 0% | 135 | 43% | 7 |
| [Error and crash monitoring](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/error-and-crash-monitoring/index.md) | 0% | 50 | 57% | 7 |
| [Log management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/log-management/index.md) | 0% | 20 | 0% | 7 |
| [Cloud-native application protection](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/cloud/cloud-native-application-protection/index.md) | 0% | 38 | 0% | 2 |
| [Application shielding](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/application-shielding/index.md) | 0% | 61 | 0% | 1 |
| [Cloud cost management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/cloud/cloud-cost-management/index.md) | 0% | 58 | 0% | 1 |
| [Data center infrastructure management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/data-center-infrastructure-management/index.md) | 0% | 50 | 0% | 1 |
| [Time series databases](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/time-series-databases/index.md) | 0% | 19 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "For organizations with cloud-native environments and container orchestration, tools like Datadog, Prometheus, or Dynatrace are excellent choices." (MiniMax M2.5, Infra monitoring)
- "Pick Dynatrace if you value the most mature automated root‑cause analysis and want full‑stack observability with AI" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, AIOps)
- "Dynatrace or Datadog | Deep code-level tracing and automatic root-cause pinpointing across cloud environments." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, AIOps)
- "Do you need exact root causes or probable ones? → *Dynatrace* (causal AI). Most others give probabilities." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, AIOps)

## And against it

- "Avoid: Writing code that sends telemetry directly to third-party APIs (e.g., sending logs straight to Splunk Cloud, Datadog, or Dynatrace APIs)" (Mistral Small, Telemetry pipelines)
- "Do not use heavy Application Performance Monitoring suites (like Dynatrace or AppDynamics) solely for error tracking." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Error monitoring)
- "Legacy vendor-specific agents (New Relic, AppDynamics, Dynatrace traditional agents) | Closed data formats" (Kimi K2, Telemetry pipelines)
- "Often recommended to be avoided unless you are a large enterprise with a dedicated SRE team." (Mistral Small, APM)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 2 | 14 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 20 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| Grok 4.20 | 2 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 36 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 19 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 18 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 9 | 7 | 10 | 27 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 23 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 13 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 3 | 14 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 14 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Dynatrace, from 676 of the 779 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 266
- newrelic.com: 236
- motadata.com: 175
- dynatrace.com: 111 (its own site)
- coralogix.com: 107
- manageengine.com: 95
- middleware.io: 92
- cubeapm.com: 91
- gane.ai/index: 91
- softwareadvice.com: 91

### Pages cited

- https://g2.com/categories/aiops-platforms: 62
- https://motadata.com/blog/best-it-infrastructure-monitoring-tools: 60
- https://newrelic.com/blog/observability/enterprise-apm: 55
- https://manageengine.com/it-operations-management/application-observability/apm-tools-comparison.html: 46
- https://dotcom-monitor.com/blog/best-observability-tools: 41
- https://dynatrace.com/platform/comparison: 41
- https://middleware.io/blog/infrastructure-monitoring-tools: 36
- https://sherlocks.ai/blog/how-to-choose-observability-platform-2026: 36

## In its own words

What Dynatrace's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Observability built for the age of AI (https://dynatrace.com/)
- For: today’s digital businesses (https://dynatrace.com/)
- Price stated: Reduce costs with clear, simple pricing (https://dynatrace.com/)
- Starting price: 0 (https://dynatrace.com/)
- Free plan or trial: 15-day free trial (https://dynatrace.com/)
- Integrations claimed: 900 (https://www.dynatrace.com/pricing)
- Certifications: ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP, HIPAA, CCPA, DESC CSP Security Standard
- Hosting: across our global data center footprint
- Customers named: Air France-KLM, ADT, Next, WeLab Bank, Virgin Money, Agos, FreedomPay, BMO

## What it publishes

Every page dynatrace.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 12045 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 98 pages, 39 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- case study: 131 pages, 19 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- webinar or virtual event: 168 pages, 20 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-25
- conference or event: 54 pages, 10 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- report or ebook: 424 pages, 20 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- comparison: 23 pages, 6 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-09
- template or tool: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 34 pages, 4 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-23
- news or press: 1870 pages, 65 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-25
- Recent: 2026-09-28 case study: Bmo https://www.dynatrace.com/customers/bmo
- Recent: 2026-09-28 case study: Zurich north america https://www.dynatrace.com/customers/zurich-north-america
- Recent: 2026-09-28 case study: Adt https://www.dynatrace.com/customers/adt
- Recent: 2026-09-28 report or ebook: Notebooks https://www.dynatrace.com/platform/notebooks
- Recent: 2026-09-28 conference or event: Servicenow world forum london https://www.dynatrace.com/info/events/servicenow-world-forum-london
- Recent: 2026-09-28 blog: 5 reasons customers switch from splunk to dynatrace 20029328 https://www.dynatrace.com/resources/5-reasons-customers-switch-from-splunk-to-dynatrace-20029328/

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.