# CyberArk Conjur: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 24 judge labels across 2 categories by 11 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/cyberark-conjur

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Secrets management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/identity/secrets-management/index.md) | 0% | 12 | 25% | 20 |
| [Non-human identity management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/identity/non-human-identity-management/index.md) | 0% | 126 | 75% | 4 |

## What the models said for it

- "Prioritize Open-Source with Strong Community & Security Audits: (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Conjur, ESO Enterprise Secrets Manager)" (MiniMax M2.5, Secrets)
- "Ideal for regulated industries or companies needing PAM-grade governance and identity management." (Mistral Small, Secrets)
- "If governance and CI/CD integration are top priorities, evaluate Conjur." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, NHI management)
- "Highly regulated organization already using CyberArk: CyberArk Conjur." (Perplexity Sonar, Secrets)

## And against it

- "Generally advised to avoid unless you are a regulated enterprise" (Mistral Small, Secrets)
- "exposed 14 zero-day vulnerabilities in major secrets management platforms including HashiCorp Vault and CyberArk Conjur" (Kimi K2, NHI management)
- "Complex and costly to operate. Steeper learning curve; best suited for large organizations." (GLM 4.7 FlashX, Secrets)
- "Can be overkill and expensive for a 500-person company if you don't need full PAM." (Kimi K2, Secrets)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CyberArk Conjur, from 72 of the 78 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- securityboulevard.com: 44
- akeyless.io: 38
- startwithidentity.com: 29
- g2.com: 22
- infisical.com: 21
- gane.ai/index: 18
- cybersecuritynews.com: 16
- github.com: 16
- spotsaas.com: 15
- cheatsheetseries.owasp.org: 14

### Pages cited

- https://securityboulevard.com/2026/05/top-16-secrets-management-tools-and-platforms-for-2026-compared: 27
- https://akeyless.io/blog/the-essential-guide-to-secrets-management: 22
- https://securityboulevard.com/2024/02/top-secrets-management-tools-for-2024: 16
- https://startwithidentity.com/articles/top-8-secrets-management-tools.md: 16
- https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/cheatsheets/Secrets_Management_Cheat_Sheet.html: 14
- https://spotsaas.com/blog/best-secrets-management-tools: 14
- https://subrupt.com/best/secrets-management: 12
- https://securityboulevard.com/2025/08/top-6-secrets-management-tools-you-need-in-2025: 11

## In its own words

What CyberArk Conjur's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.


## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.