# Checkmarx SCA alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 239 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where Checkmarx SCA holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/checkmarx-sca/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Snyk Open Source: 68
- Trivy: 37
- Sonatype Lifecycle: 22
- OWASP Dependency-Check: 15
- OWASP Dependency-Track: 12
- GitHub Dependabot: 11

## Software composition analysis

**Small business**: 83 of 84 answers did not name Checkmarx SCA.

- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 36 of those 83
- Trivy: first choice in 17 of those 83
- OWASP Dependency-Check: first choice in 10 of those 83
- GitHub Dependabot: first choice in 7 of those 83
- OSV-Scanner: first choice in 5 of those 83
- Aikido Security: first choice in 2 of those 83
- FOSSA: first choice in 1 of those 83
- GitHub Advanced Security: first choice in 1 of those 83

**Mid-market**: 81 of 84 answers did not name Checkmarx SCA (Checkmarx SCA is #18 of 19 at 0%).

- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 25 of those 81
- Trivy: first choice in 17 of those 81
- OWASP Dependency-Check: first choice in 5 of those 81
- GitHub Dependabot: first choice in 4 of those 81
- Mend.io – Mend SCA: first choice in 3 of those 81
- OWASP Dependency-Track: first choice in 3 of those 81
- Sonatype Lifecycle: first choice in 2 of those 81
- Aikido Security: first choice in 1 of those 81

**Enterprise**: 75 of 84 answers did not name Checkmarx SCA (Checkmarx SCA is #12 of 14 at 0%).

- Sonatype Lifecycle: first choice in 20 of those 75
- Black Duck: first choice in 9 of those 75
- OWASP Dependency-Track: first choice in 9 of those 75
- Snyk Open Source: first choice in 7 of those 75
- Mend.io – Mend SCA: first choice in 5 of those 75
- OSV-Scanner: first choice in 3 of those 75
- Trivy: first choice in 3 of those 75
- Aikido Security: first choice in 1 of those 75

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.