# Checkmarx One ASPM: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 27 judge labels across 1 category by 13 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/checkmarx-one-aspm

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Application security posture management](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/application-security-posture-management/index.md) | 0% | 21 | 30% | 27 |

## What the models said for it

- "if your team is already deep in the Checkmarx ecosystem, Checkmarx ASPM is probably the more efficient choice" (GPT-5.4 mini, ASPM)
- "Unified SAST/SCA/DAST + ASPM in one platform, strong remediation workflows" (Grok 4.20, ASPM)
- "Part of broader security platforms (Palo Alto, Wiz, Snyk, Checkmarx)" (Kimi K2, ASPM)
- "or Checkmarx One for an app-first posture with PR-native execution" (Muse Glimmer 30B, ASPM)

## And against it

- "Around 71% negative in certain evaluations... criticized for vendor lock-in, alert fatigue" (Grok 4.20, ASPM)
- "Avoid scanner add-ons (e.g., basic features from Snyk or Checkmarx)" (Grok 4.20, ASPM)
- "Their pricing and feature sets are often not a good fit for organizations with limited budgets or simpler needs." (Mistral Small, ASPM)
- "Who to Watch Out For: Checkmarx, Fortify, SonarQube (in default mode), and Qualys." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, ASPM)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Checkmarx One ASPM, from 80 of the 83 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- csoonline.com: 48
- checkmarx.com: 47 (its own site)
- g2.com: 38
- cycode.com: 33
- gane.ai/index: 26
- ox.security: 26
- gartner.com: 21
- appsecsanta.com: 19
- peerspot.com: 19
- safeguard.sh: 18

### Pages cited

- https://csoonline.com/article/4041891/aspm-buyers-guide-seven-products-to-help-secure-your-applications.html: 48
- https://checkmarx.com/learn/aspm/best-aspm-tools-5-platforms-to-watch-in-2026: 30
- https://ox.security/blog/aspm-tools: 23
- https://g2.com/categories/application-security-posture-management-aspm/enterprise: 21
- https://appsecsanta.com/aspm-tools: 18
- https://expertinsights.com/application-security/the-top-application-security-posture-management-aspm-tools: 16
- https://gbhackers.com/best-aspm-compared: 16
- https://start.paloaltonetworks.com/rs/531-OCS-018/images/aspm-buyers-guide.pdf: 16

## In its own words

What Checkmarx One ASPM's own pages state, read 2026-10-06. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Checkmarx has been named a leader in Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) in the 2024 Frost Radar™ Report by Frost & Sullivan. (https://checkmarx.com/2024-frost-sullivan-aspm-report-g)
- For: anyone re-evaluating their AppSec program or simply trying to keep pace with modern software delivery (https://checkmarx.com/how-aspm-and-ai-are-reshaping-appsec)
- Free plan or trial: Download your free copy (https://checkmarx.com/report-idc-marketscape-for-aspm-2025)
- Certifications: ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named: CGI, Best Buy

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.
