# Checkmarx Codebashing: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 16 judge labels across 1 category by 9 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/checkmarx-codebashing

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Secure code training](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/secure-code-training/index.md) | 0% | 24 | 25% | 16 |

## What the models said for it

- "SafeStack Academy and Checkmarx Codebashing are the most frequently recommended alternatives." (Muse Glimmer 30B, Secure code training)
- "Short, gamified lessons integrated with tools such as Checkmarx and developer workflows." (Perplexity Sonar, Secure code training)
- "Best for Micro-Learning & Low Developer Interruption: Checkmarx Codebashing" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Secure code training)
- "Best for: Micro-learning embedded directly into developer workflows." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Secure code training)

## And against it

- "Veracode Security Labs, Synopsys, and Checkmarx Codebashing, which are considered to be high-cost and high-friction" (Llama 4 Maverick, Secure code training)
- "they can feel more bolted-on than dedicated platforms like SCW, and pricing may be higher for mid-market" (Grok 4.20, Secure code training)
- "Be cautious if your organization does not already use the associated security tool." (Perplexity Sonar, Secure code training)
- "Users have reported account configuration issues that required workarounds" (Claude Haiku 4.5, Secure code training)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Checkmarx Codebashing, from 47 of the 51 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 32
- sourceforge.net: 30
- ransomleak.com: 25
- securecodewarrior.com: 24
- comparitech.com: 23
- blog.secureflag.com: 22
- guideflow.com: 22
- reddit.com: 21
- aws.amazon.com: 18
- gane.ai/index: 17

### Pages cited

- https://ransomleak.com/blog/best-secure-coding-training-2026: 25
- https://comparitech.com/net-admin/best-secure-code-training-tools: 23
- https://guideflow.com/blog/application-security-training: 22
- https://blog.secureflag.com/2026/09/25/best-secure-coding-training-platforms: 21
- https://reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/1ip5cke/what_platform_do_you_use_to_train_developers_on: 17
- https://g2.com/categories/secure-code-training/enterprise: 13
- https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/secure-code-training/enterprise: 11
- https://sourceforge.net/software/secure-code-training/for-enterprise: 11

## In its own words

What Checkmarx Codebashing's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Application security training for developers, by developers. (https://devhub.checkmarx.com/tool/codebashing)
- For: developers (https://devhub.checkmarx.com/tool/codebashing)
- Free plan or trial: Get your free custom demo now (https://checkmarx.com/product/codebashing-secure-code-training)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.