# AWS CodeCommit: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 8 judge labels across 1 category by 8 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/aws-codecommit

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Source control hosting](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/source-control-hosting/index.md) | 0% | 27 | 62% | 8 |

## What the models said for it

- "Best For: AWS-centric architectures, teams wanting minimal overhead" (Kimi K2, Source control)
- "AWS-only internal tooling: AWS CodeCommit" (GPT-5.4 mini, Source control)

## And against it

- "Avoid using CodeCommit for new projects unless deep, native AWS IAM integration is an absolute strict compliance requirement." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Source control)
- "AWS closed CodeCommit to new customers in 2024, making its long-term availability and migration path a concern." (Perplexity Sonar, Source control)
- "This service is notoriously difficult to export... acts as a financial trap" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Source control)
- "Treat as a caution, not an automatic "avoid" - AWS CodeCommit: ... that policy reversal is a reminder to check a provider's roadmap" (GPT-6 Luna, Source control)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AWS CodeCommit, from 22 of the 25 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- aws.amazon.com: 9 (its own site)
- atlassian.com: 5
- bitbucket.org: 5
- citehawk.com: 5
- docs.gitlab.com: 5
- gane.ai/index: 5
- docs.github.com: 4
- g2.com: 4
- rhodecode.com: 4
- about.gitlab.com: 3

### Pages cited

- https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/devops/aws-codecommit-returns-to-general-availability: 7
- https://bitbucket.org/product/code-repository: 4
- https://ciopages.com/buyer-guides/source-code-management: 3
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_source-code-hosting_facilities: 3
- https://www.gane.ai/index/it/developer/source-control-hosting/enterprise: 3
- https://hiraditya.github.io/posts/where-should-your-code-live: 3
- https://openresource.dev/guide/getting-started/source-code-hosting-platforms: 3
- https://opensourcereviews.github.io/forge/index.html: 3

## In its own words

What AWS CodeCommit's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Git repository hosting service (https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit)
- For: teams (https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit)
- Price stated: AWS CodeCommit costs $1 per active user per month. For every active user, your account receives an additional allowance of 10 GB-month of storage and 2,000 Git requests for that month. If you need more storage or Git requests for your users, additional usage will be charged at $0.06 per GB-month and $0.001 per Git request. (https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit/faqs)
- Starting price: 1 (https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit/faqs)
- Free plan or trial: Get started for free; AWS Free Tier offer for CodeCommit is available indefinitely to both new and existing AWS customers (https://aws.amazon.com/codecommit/pricing)
- Hosting: each AWS region

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.