# Attivo Networks alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 241 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where Attivo Networks holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/attivo-networks/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Thinkst Canary: 82
- Acalvio ShadowPlex: 43
- Canarytokens: 10
- OpenCanary: 9
- CounterCraft: 3
- Tracebit: 3

## Deception technology

**Small business**: 83 of 84 answers did not name Attivo Networks.

- Thinkst Canary: first choice in 42 of those 83
- Canarytokens: first choice in 7 of those 83
- OpenCanary: first choice in 7 of those 83
- Tracebit: first choice in 3 of those 83
- Cynet: first choice in 2 of those 83
- SentinelOne Singularity: first choice in 2 of those 83
- CRM Honeypots: first choice in 1 of those 83
- CyberTrap: first choice in 1 of those 83

**Mid-market**: 80 of 84 answers did not name Attivo Networks (Attivo Networks is #16 of 16 at 0%).

- Thinkst Canary: first choice in 30 of those 80
- Acalvio ShadowPlex: first choice in 8 of those 80
- Canarytokens: first choice in 3 of those 80
- HoneyWire: first choice in 2 of those 80
- OpenCanary: first choice in 2 of those 80
- Canarytoken: first choice in 1 of those 80
- Canarytokens OSS: first choice in 1 of those 80
- CounterCraft: first choice in 1 of those 80

**Enterprise**: 78 of 84 answers did not name Attivo Networks (Attivo Networks is #5 of 13 at 2%).

- Acalvio ShadowPlex: first choice in 35 of those 78
- Thinkst Canary: first choice in 10 of those 78
- Zscaler Deception: first choice in 3 of those 78
- CounterCraft: first choice in 2 of those 78
- Attivo Networks ThreatDefend: first choice in 1 of those 78
- Attivo Networks, now SentinelOne Deception / ThreatDeception: first choice in 1 of those 78
- CounterCraft Cyber Deception Platform: first choice in 1 of those 78
- Fidelis Deception: first choice in 1 of those 78

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.