# Amazon Textract: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 27 judge labels across 1 category by 12 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/amazon-textract

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Intelligent document processing](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/index.md) | 4% | 8 | 30% | 27 |

## What the models said for it

- ""I have a developer" | Amazon Textract or Google Document AI | Rawest price per page ($0.0015). No markup." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Document processing)
- "Amazon Textract is often the safest budget-conscious choice for teams that want a scalable IDP foundation" (GPT-5.4 mini, Document processing)
- "Developers usually prefer AWS Textract or Azure AI Document Intelligence APIs to integrate into custom apps" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Document processing)
- "Cloud APIs like Azure Document Intelligence, Amazon Textract, Google Document AI, or Mistral OCR" (Claude Haiku 4.5, Document processing)

## And against it

- "Avoid if you do not have a dedicated DevOps team to maintain the code." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, Document processing)
- "Amazon Textract as a standalone, turnkey IDP platform. Treat it as a document-processing building block: you may need to add workflow orchestration, validation, and exception handling yourself." (GPT-6 Luna, Document processing)
- "Google Document AI, Amazon Textract, and Azure Document Intelligence can provide strong extraction, but you may need to build validation, exception queues... They are risky choices" (Perplexity Sonar, Document processing)
- "zero out-of-the-box user interface or business workflow. Your team must build the exception-handling UI, ERP integrations, and business logic manually." (Gemini 3.5 Flash, Document processing)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Amazon Textract, from 79 of the 89 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 33
- docsumo.com: 31
- ciopages.com: 18
- nanonets.com: 17
- parseur.com: 17
- research.isg-one.com: 16
- aiflowreview.com: 15
- grooper.com: 15
- larksuite.com: 15
- abbyy.com: 13

### Pages cited

- https://docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software: 26
- https://ciopages.com/buyer-guides/intelligent-document-processing: 18
- https://g2.com/categories/intelligent-document-processing-idp/small-business: 17
- https://aiflowreview.com/ai-document-processing-software: 15
- https://grooper.com/blog_posts/intelligent-document-processing-vendors: 15
- https://larksuite.com/en_us/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software: 15
- https://research.isg-one.com/buyers-guide/digital_technology/intelligent_document_processing/2024: 14
- https://nanonets.com/buyers-guide/best-intelligent-document-processing-software: 13

## In its own words

What Amazon Textract's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.


## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.