# Process mining: what AI models recommend, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Asked as "process mining tool" and as "process intelligence platform", six framings each, to fourteen models with search on, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. Added to the November 2026 Edition. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/process-mining

**Standing:** Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining leads with 29% of first choices; verdict contested. 52 first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts.

## First-choice share

| Rank | Product | Share | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining/index.md) | 29% | 9% | 47 |
| 2 | [Apromore](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/apromore/index.md) | 27% | 9% | 46 |
| 3 | [UiPath Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/uipath-process-mining/index.md) | 10% | 18% | 56 |
| 5 | [Celonis Process Intelligence Platform](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/celonis-process-intelligence-platform/index.md) | 6% | 51% | 65 |
| 6 | [PM4Py](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/pm4py/index.md) | 4% | 17% | 12 |
| 7 | [Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/microsoft-power-automate/index.md) | 4% | 20% | 10 |
| 9 | [SAP Signavio Process Intelligence](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/sap-signavio-process-intelligence/index.md) | 2% | 33% | 49 |
| 10 | [ABBYY Timeline](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/abbyy-timeline/index.md) | 2% | 12% | 16 |
| 15 | [QPR ProcessAnalyzer](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/qpr-processanalyzer/index.md) | 0% | 0% | 11 |
| 16 | [IBM Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/ibm-process-mining/index.md) | 0% | 29% | 24 |
| 69 | [ProM](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/prom/index.md) | 0% | 50% | 14 |

Rank is by share of first choices among all 72 products named; products with the same share are tied, and the order among them carries no meaning. The table lists those with at least 10 labels.

## Each model's first choice on the direct prompt

- Claude Haiku 4.5: Mindzie; alternatives Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
- GPT-5.4 mini: Apromore; alternatives SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining; alternatives Apromore, UiPath Process Mining
- Perplexity Sonar: Apromore; alternatives Power Automate Process Mining, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Grok 4.20: Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining; alternatives Apromore, UiPath Process Mining, process.science
- Mistral Small: ABBYY Timeline, Apromore, UiPath Process Mining; alternatives Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: ProcessMind; alternatives Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
- Llama 4 Maverick: Mindzie
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath Process Mining; alternatives Apromore, QPR ProcessAdvisor
- Kimi K2: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining; alternatives QPR ProcessAnalyzer, UiPath Process Mining
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: UiPath Process Mining, process.science; alternatives IBM Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
- MiniMax M2.5: Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining; alternatives IBM Process Mining
- GPT-6 Luna: Apromore; alternatives Celonis Process Intelligence Platform, Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Muse Glimmer 30B: Kye, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining; alternatives Mindzie, Workfellow, process.science

## Sources the answers cite

74 of 84 answers came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models. Sites named in the most answers:

- g2.com: 28 answers, 41 citations
- superkind.ai: 26 answers, 26 citations
- guideflow.com: 25 answers, 25 citations
- bardeen.ai: 23 answers, 25 citations
- erpresearch.com: 23 answers, 24 citations
- omr.com: 18 answers, 18 citations
- peerspot.com: 16 answers, 19 citations
- kyp.ai: 15 answers, 22 citations

Pages named in the most answers:

- https://superkind.ai/blog/ai-process-mining-tools (26 answers)
- https://guideflow.com/blog/process-mining-tools (25 answers)
- https://erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/process-mining (21 answers)
- https://g2.com/categories/process-mining-tools (19 answers)
- https://bardeen.ai/best/process-mining-tools (18 answers)
- https://omr.com/en/reviews/category/process-mining (18 answers)
- https://research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-process-mining-platforms-2024/leaders (15 answers)
- https://softwaresuggest.com/process-mining-tools (14 answers)
- https://kyp.ai/process-mining-software-comparison (12 answers)
- https://processmind.com/resources/blog/the-best-process-mining-tools-of-2026 (11 answers)

## Warned against

- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: 33 of 65 labels negative. "Tools to Skip (for Mid-Market) ... Category leader but enterprise-focused; contracts typically start at $150K/year" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, direct prompt)
- SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: 16 of 49 labels negative. "SAP Signavio — Only makes sense if you're heavily SAP-centric, and pricing is enterprise-tier." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt)
- UiPath Process Mining: 10 of 56 labels negative. "mid-to-high cost and overkill for limited budgets" (Grok 4.20, budget prompt)
- ProM: 7 of 14 labels negative. "avoid deploying it for production enterprise use" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt)

## Movement since October 2026

Floor: 11 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat.
New leader: Apromore (19%) to Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining (29%). Margin 2 points, within noise.

- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: 14% to 29%, +15. Cleared the floor by 4 points · rank 2 → 1 of 72.
- IBM Process Mining: 14% to 0%, −14. Cleared the floor by 3 points · rank 3 → 16 of 72.
- Apromore: 19% to 27%, +8. Inside the floor by 3 points · rank 1 → 2 of 72.
- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: 3% to 6%, +3. Inside the floor by 8 points · rank 10 → 5 of 72.
- PM4Py: 2% to 4%, +2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 13 → 6 of 72.
- ABBYY Timeline: 0% to 2%, +2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 25 → 10 of 72.
- ProM: 2% to 0%, −2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 14 → 69 of 72.
- Microsoft Power Automate: 5% to 4%, −1. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 6 → 7 of 72.
- SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: 3% to 2%, −1. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 8 → 9 of 72.
- UiPath Process Mining: 10% to 10%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 4 → 3 of 72.
- QPR ProcessAnalyzer: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 24 → 15 of 72.
- ARIS Process Mining: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 20 → 25 of 72.

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.