# Process mining for enterprise buyers: what AI models recommend, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Asked as "process mining tool" and as "process intelligence platform", six framings each, to fourteen models with search on, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. Added to the November 2026 Edition. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/operations/process-mining/enterprise

**Standing:** Celonis Process Intelligence Platform leads with 68% of first choices; verdict consensus. 47 first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts.

## First-choice share

| Rank | Product | Share | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Celonis Process Intelligence Platform](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/celonis-process-intelligence-platform/index.md) | 68% | 16% | 75 |
| 2 | [Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/microsoft-power-automate-process-mining/index.md) | 15% | 10% | 40 |
| 3 | [Apromore](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/apromore/index.md) | 6% | 7% | 30 |
| 4 | [IBM Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/ibm-process-mining/index.md) | 4% | 12% | 41 |
| 5 | [Microsoft Power Automate](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/microsoft-power-automate/index.md) | 4% | 8% | 13 |
| 6 | [UiPath Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/uipath-process-mining/index.md) | 2% | 20% | 60 |
| 7 | [SAP Signavio Process Intelligence](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/sap-signavio-process-intelligence/index.md) | 0% | 17% | 65 |
| 8 | [ARIS Process Mining](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/aris-process-mining/index.md) | 0% | 7% | 14 |
| 9 | [ABBYY Timeline](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/abbyy-timeline/index.md) | 0% | 18% | 22 |
| 11 | [Appian](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/appian/index.md) | 0% | 10% | 10 |

Rank is by share of first choices among all 53 products named; products with the same share are tied, and the order among them carries no meaning. The table lists those with at least 10 labels.

## Each model's first choice on the direct prompt

- Claude Haiku 4.5: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives ABBYY Timeline, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
- GPT-5.4 mini: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Perplexity Sonar: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives ARIS Process Mining, Apromore, IBM Process Mining, Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining
- Grok 4.20: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Mistral Small: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Apromore, IBM Process Mining, UiPath Process Mining
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Llama 4 Maverick: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Kimi K2: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Microsoft, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- MiniMax M2.5: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Apromore, Microsoft Power Automate, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence
- GPT-6 Luna: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining
- Muse Glimmer 30B: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform; alternatives SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining

## Sources the answers cite

77 of 84 answers came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models. Sites named in the most answers:

- g2.com: 40 answers, 52 citations
- erpresearch.com: 27 answers, 43 citations
- guideflow.com: 27 answers, 27 citations
- signavio.com: 25 answers, 38 citations
- techtarget.com: 24 answers, 29 citations
- ibm.com: 23 answers, 30 citations
- research.oz.spotlightar.com: 20 answers, 20 citations
- trycaddi.com: 18 answers, 23 citations

Pages named in the most answers:

- https://guideflow.com/blog/process-mining-tools (27 answers)
- https://erpresearch.com/erp-add-ons/process-mining (25 answers)
- https://g2.com/categories/process-mining-tools/enterprise (23 answers)
- https://techtarget.com/news/Process-mining-software-comparison-What-CIOs-should-look-at/848759 (19 answers)
- https://research.oz.spotlightar.com/reports/magic-quadrant-process-mining-platforms-2024/leaders (17 answers)
- https://signavio.com/wiki/process-discovery/process-mining-software (16 answers)
- https://superkind.ai/blog/ai-process-mining-tools (16 answers)
- https://gane.ai/index/it/operations/process-mining/enterprise (15 answers)
- https://trycaddi.com/blog/process-mining-software (14 answers)
- https://vendorbenchmark.com/blog/process-mining-platform-pricing-benchmark (13 answers)

## Warned against

- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: 12 of 75 labels negative. "Avoid making Celonis the first choice for this constraint: it is often regarded as the strongest enterprise platform, but pricing is custom" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt)
- UiPath Process Mining: 12 of 60 labels negative. "What I would avoid for your use case: tools that price heavily by named users... UiPath's current process mining licensing is consumption-based" (GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt)
- SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: 11 of 65 labels negative. "Tools to Avoid for Predictable Budgeting ... Complex, no public rate card" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, budget prompt)
- IBM Process Mining: 5 of 41 labels negative. "Enterprise should avoid this if they don't have significant IBM infrastructure already in place." (Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt)

## Movement since October 2026

Floor: 11 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat.
Same leader: Celonis Process Intelligence Platform at 68%.

- SAP Signavio Process Intelligence: 7% to 0%, −7. Inside the floor by 4 points · rank 3 → 7 of 53.
- Apromore: 0% to 6%, +6. Inside the floor by 5 points · rank 8 → 3 of 53.
- Microsoft Power Automate Process Mining: 20% to 15%, −5. Inside the floor by 6 points · rank 2 of 53, unchanged.
- Microsoft Power Automate: 0% to 4%, +4. Inside the floor by 7 points · rank 7 → 5 of 53.
- UiPath Process Mining: 0% to 2%, +2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 6 of 53, unchanged.
- Celonis Process Intelligence Platform: 67% to 68%, +1. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 1 of 53, unchanged.
- IBM Process Mining: 4% to 4%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 4 of 53, unchanged.
- ARIS Process Mining: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 11 → 8 of 53.
- ABBYY Timeline: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 9 of 53, unchanged.
- Appian: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 10 → 11 of 53.

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.