# Intelligent document processing: what AI models recommend, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Asked as "intelligent document processing platform" and as "IDP software", six framings each, to fourteen models with search on, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. Added to the November 2026 Edition. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/it-data/intelligent-document-processing/2026-11

**Standing:** Nanonets leads with 31% of first choices; verdict contested. 52 first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts.

## First-choice share

| Rank | Product | Share | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Nanonets](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/nanonets/index.md) | 31% | 0% | 42 |
| 2 | [Rossum](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/rossum/index.md) | 15% | 12% | 49 |
| 3 | [Docsumo](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/docsumo/index.md) | 10% | 0% | 25 |
| 4 | [Parseur](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/parseur/index.md) | 8% | 10% | 10 |
| 5 | [ABBYY Vantage](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/abbyy-vantage/index.md) | 6% | 28% | 50 |
| 6 | [UiPath Document Understanding](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/uipath-document-understanding/index.md) | 4% | 16% | 44 |
| 7 | [Google Document AI](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/google-document-ai/index.md) | 4% | 24% | 29 |
| 8 | [Amazon Textract](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/amazon-textract/index.md) | 4% | 30% | 27 |
| 9 | [Azure AI Document Intelligence](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/azure-ai-document-intelligence/index.md) | 4% | 33% | 18 |
| 11 | [Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/microsoft-azure-ai-document-intelligence/index.md) | 2% | 0% | 15 |
| 12 | [Tungsten Automation](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/tungsten-automation/index.md) | 2% | 18% | 11 |
| 17 | [Hyperscience Hypercell](https://www.gane.ai/index/it/vendors/hyperscience-hypercell/index.md) | 0% | 24% | 33 |

Rank is by share of first choices among all 121 products named; products with the same share are tied, and the order among them carries no meaning. The table lists those with at least 10 labels.

## Each model's first choice on the direct prompt

- Claude Haiku 4.5: Nanonets; alternatives Doxis AI.dp, Rossum
- GPT-5.4 mini: ABBYY Vantage; alternatives AWS IDP, Azure AI Document Intelligence, Rossum
- Gemini 3.5 Flash: Nanonets; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Docsumo, Rossum
- Perplexity Sonar: Nanonets; alternatives Docsumo, Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence, Parseur
- Grok 4.20: Rossum; alternatives ABBYY Vantage or FlexiCapture, Docsumo, Hyperscience Hypercell, UiPath Document Understanding
- Mistral Small: ABBYY Vantage, Rossum; alternatives Apryse, Turian
- DeepSeek V4 Flash: Docsumo; alternatives Nanonets, Rossum
- Llama 4 Maverick: Nanonets; alternatives Apryse PDF SDK, Parseur
- Qwen 3.7 Flash: Nanonets; alternatives Extend, Rossum, Turian
- Kimi K2: Rossum; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence, Nanonets
- GLM 4.7 FlashX: UiPath Document Understanding; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Automation Anywhere Intelligent Automation, Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence, ServiceNow Document Management
- MiniMax M2.5: Nanonets; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Docsumo, Hyperscience Hypercell, Rossum
- GPT-6 Luna: Rossum; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Nanonets, UiPath Document Understanding
- Muse Glimmer 30B: Nanonets, Rossum; alternatives ABBYY Vantage, Automation Anywhere, Google Document AI, UiPath Document Understanding

## Sources the answers cite

73 of 84 answers came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models. Sites named in the most answers:

- g2.com: 31 answers, 52 citations
- nanonets.com: 28 answers, 33 citations
- docsumo.com: 27 answers, 53 citations
- research.isg-one.com: 23 answers, 37 citations
- ciopages.com: 22 answers, 22 citations
- idp-software.com: 17 answers, 22 citations
- parseur.com: 16 answers, 28 citations
- avasant.com: 14 answers, 15 citations

Pages named in the most answers:

- https://research.isg-one.com/buyers-guide/digital_technology/intelligent_document_processing/2024 (23 answers)
- https://ciopages.com/buyer-guides/intelligent-document-processing (22 answers)
- https://nanonets.com/buyers-guide/best-intelligent-document-processing-software (21 answers)
- https://docsumo.com/blog/the-best-intelligent-document-processing-software (18 answers)
- https://research.isg-one.com/market-perspectives/isg-buyers-guide-for-intelligent-document-processing-classifies-and-rates-software-providers (14 answers)
- https://avasant.com/report/intelligent-document-processing-platforms-2024-2025-radarview (13 answers)
- https://guideflow.com/blog/intelligent-document-processing-software (13 answers)
- https://verifiedmarketresearch.com/blog/top-intelligent-document-processing-software (13 answers)
- https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/intelligent-document-processing-software (12 answers)
- https://parseur.com/blog/best-IDP-tools (11 answers)

## Warned against

- ABBYY Vantage: 14 of 50 labels negative. "What to avoid if you're on a tight budget - ABBYY, Hyperscience, Rossum, UiPath: These are enterprise-grade but quote-only" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt)
- Rossum: 6 of 49 labels negative. "Avoid If Budget Is Tight | Rossum | $18,000/year | Enterprise-focused, annual contracts" (Kimi K2, budget prompt)
- UiPath Document Understanding: 7 of 44 labels negative. "Avoid enterprise tools like ABBYY Vantage, UiPath, Rossum, or Hyperscience" (Grok 4.20, budget prompt)
- Hyperscience Hypercell: 8 of 33 labels negative. "Avoid starting with Rossum, ABBYY, Hyperscience, or similar enterprise platforms" (Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt)

## Movement since October 2026

Floor: 11 points of share, measured on the calibration repeat.
Same leader: Nanonets at 31%.

- Docsumo: 6% to 10%, +4. Inside the floor by 7 points · rank 4 → 3 of 121.
- Azure AI Document Intelligence: 0% to 4%, +4. Inside the floor by 7 points · rank 22 → 9 of 121.
- ABBYY Vantage: 4% to 6%, +2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 8 → 5 of 121.
- Google Document AI: 6% to 4%, −2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 5 → 7 of 121.
- Tungsten Automation: 0% to 2%, +2. Inside the floor by 9 points · rank 21 → 12 of 121.
- Nanonets: 32% to 31%, −1. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 1 of 121, unchanged.
- Rossum: 16% to 15%, −1. Inside the floor by 10 points · rank 2 of 121, unchanged.
- Parseur: 8% to 8%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 3 → 4 of 121.
- UiPath Document Understanding: 4% to 4%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 6 of 121, unchanged.
- Amazon Textract: 4% to 4%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 7 → 8 of 121.
- Microsoft Azure AI Document Intelligence: 2% to 2%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 11 of 121, unchanged.
- Hyperscience Hypercell: 0% to 0%, ±0. Inside the floor by 11 points · rank 17 of 121, unchanged.

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/it/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/it.