# ThriveSparrow Engage alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 216 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where ThriveSparrow Engage holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/vendors/thrivesparrow-engage/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Culture Amp: 36
- 15Five Engage: 29
- Workleap Officevibe: 22
- Qualtrics EmployeeXM: 15
- Lattice Engagement: 6
- Bonusly: 4

## Employee engagement surveys

**Small business**: 62 of 84 answers did not name ThriveSparrow Engage (ThriveSparrow Engage is #3 of 11 at 14%).

- Workleap Officevibe: first choice in 17 of those 62
- 15Five Engage: first choice in 10 of those 62
- Bonusly: first choice in 4 of those 62
- FeedbackPulse: first choice in 3 of those 62
- SurveyMonkey: first choice in 2 of those 62
- Zoho Survey: first choice in 2 of those 62
- Clarity Wave: first choice in 1 of those 62
- Culture Amp: first choice in 1 of those 62

**Mid-market**: 71 of 84 answers did not name ThriveSparrow Engage (ThriveSparrow Engage is #6 of 10 at 2%).

- 15Five Engage: first choice in 16 of those 71
- Culture Amp: first choice in 13 of those 71
- Lattice Engagement: first choice in 4 of those 71
- Workleap Officevibe: first choice in 3 of those 71
- Effy AI: first choice in 1 of those 71
- Engagedly: first choice in 1 of those 71
- Google Forms: first choice in 1 of those 71
- Leapsome: first choice in 1 of those 71

**Enterprise**: 83 of 84 answers did not name ThriveSparrow Engage.

- Culture Amp: first choice in 22 of those 83
- Qualtrics EmployeeXM: first choice in 15 of those 83
- Microsoft Viva Glint: first choice in 4 of those 83
- Workday Peakon Employee Voice: first choice in 4 of those 83
- 15Five Engage: first choice in 3 of those 83
- Lattice Engagement: first choice in 2 of those 83
- Workleap Officevibe: first choice in 2 of those 83
- Adobe: first choice in 1 of those 83

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.