# Microsoft Viva Glint alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 218 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where Microsoft Viva Glint holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/vendors/microsoft-viva-glint/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- 15Five Engage: 35
- Workleap Officevibe: 27
- Culture Amp: 24
- Lattice Engagement: 7
- ThriveSparrow Engage: 7
- Bonusly: 6

## Employee engagement surveys

**Small business**: 82 of 84 answers did not name Microsoft Viva Glint.

- Workleap Officevibe: first choice in 21 of those 82
- 15Five Engage: first choice in 13 of those 82
- ThriveSparrow Engage: first choice in 7 of those 82
- Bonusly: first choice in 6 of those 82
- FeedbackPulse: first choice in 4 of those 82
- Culture Amp: first choice in 2 of those 82
- SurveyMonkey: first choice in 2 of those 82
- Zoho Survey: first choice in 2 of those 82

**Mid-market**: 81 of 84 answers did not name Microsoft Viva Glint (Microsoft Viva Glint is #8 of 10 at 0%).

- 15Five Engage: first choice in 19 of those 81
- Culture Amp: first choice in 13 of those 81
- Workleap Officevibe: first choice in 6 of those 81
- Lattice Engagement: first choice in 5 of those 81
- Engagedly: first choice in 2 of those 81
- Leapsome: first choice in 2 of those 81
- Effy AI: first choice in 1 of those 81
- Google Forms: first choice in 1 of those 81

**Enterprise**: 55 of 84 answers did not name Microsoft Viva Glint (Microsoft Viva Glint is #3 of 7 at 8%).

- Culture Amp: first choice in 9 of those 55
- Qualtrics EmployeeXM: first choice in 6 of those 55
- 15Five Engage: first choice in 3 of those 55
- Workday Peakon Employee Voice: first choice in 3 of those 55
- Lattice Engagement: first choice in 2 of those 55
- Adobe: first choice in 1 of those 55
- FeedbackPulse: first choice in 1 of those 55
- Sphinx Analytics: first choice in 1 of those 55

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.