# iTutorGroup: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 5 judge labels across 2 categories by 5 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/vendors/itutorgroup

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AI recruiting assistants](https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/talent/ai-recruiting-assistants/index.md) | 0% | 109 | 100% | 4 |
| [HR AI assistants](https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/experience/hr-ai-assistants/index.md) | 0% | 158 | 100% | 1 |

## And against it

- "iTutorGroup faced an EEOC lawsuit for using AI that allegedly discriminated against older workers and female applicants through automated screening" (MiniMax M2.5, AI recruiting assistants)
- "Settled with the U.S. EEOC in 2023 for AI hiring that allegedly discriminated based on age and national origin." (Grok 4.20, AI recruiting assistants)
- "First-ever EEOC settlement for AI-based discrimination ($365,000)" (Kimi K2, HR AI assistants)
- "iTutorGroup paid a $365,000 EEOC settlement after its automated screening software was found to systematically reject female applicants over 55" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, AI recruiting assistants)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named iTutorGroup, from 6 of the 6 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- gov.uk: 3
- en.wikipedia.org: 2
- forbes.com: 2
- gtlaw.com: 2
- hrmagazine.co.uk: 2
- ico.org.uk: 2
- news.bloomberglaw.com: 2
- paycor.com: 2
- sanfordheisler.com: 2
- sciencedirect.com: 2

### Pages cited

- https://gov.uk/government/publications/responsible-ai-in-recruitment-guide/responsible-ai-in-recruitment: 3
- https://hrmagazine.co.uk/content/features/avoid-auto-rejections-how-to-oust-ai-driven-discrimination: 2
- https://ico.org.uk/media2/migrated/4031620/ai-in-recruitment-outcomes-report.pdf: 2
- https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125008113: 2
- https://ada.gov/resources/ai-guidance: 1
- https://airisk.mit.edu/ai-incidents/95-job-screening-service-halts-facial-analysis-of-applicants: 1
- https://aiwiki.ai/wiki/employment/raw: 1
- https://alex.com/blog/bias-in-ai-recruiting-tools: 1

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/hr/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/hr.