# Reply.io Jason: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 9 judge labels across 1 category by 6 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/vendors/reply-io-jason

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AI SDR agents](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/ai-sdr-agents/index.md) | 4% | 4 | 11% | 9 |

## What the models said for it

- "1. Reply.io (with Jason AI SDR) ... This works well for mid-sized teams that want an all-in-one platform" (Claude Haiku 4.5, AI SDR)
- "Top Budget Pick: Reply.io (Jason AI)" (MiniMax M2.5, AI SDR)
- "Very affordable for adding AI capabilities to an existing outbound motion." (DeepSeek V4 Flash, AI SDR)
- "Mid-Range ... Explicit message and reply approvals give you more control" (Kimi K2, AI SDR)

## And against it

- "many are less autonomous than Artisan/11x and more focused on sequences, workflows, and assisted outreach" (GPT-5.4 mini, AI SDR)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Reply.io Jason, from 29 of the 29 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- cellcog.ai: 12
- prospeo.io: 9
- artisan.co: 8
- latenode.com: 8
- salesforge.ai: 8
- aisdr.com: 7
- grouglobal.com: 7
- albato.com: 6
- omidsaffari.com: 6
- getbreakout.ai: 5

### Pages cited

- https://cellcog.ai/blog/best-ai-sdr-tools: 12
- https://latenode.com/blog/ai-agents-for-sales: 8
- https://grouglobal.com/blog/best-ai-sdr-tools: 7
- https://salesforge.ai/blog/ai-sales-agents: 7
- https://albato.com/blog/publications/best-ai-sdr-tools: 6
- https://omidsaffari.com/blog/best-ai-sdr-tools: 6
- https://aisdr.com/pricing: 5
- https://github.com/Salesably/awesome-ai-agents-for-sales: 5

## The company

Reply.io; https://reply.io/; San Jose, United States; founded 2014. From Wikidata, fetched 2026-09-14.

## In its own words

What Reply.io Jason's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: AI-led (https://reply.io/)
- For: small teams (https://reply.io/)
- Price stated: Starts from $500/month (https://reply.io/)
- Starting price: 500 (https://reply.io/)
- Free plan or trial: free 14-day account (https://reply.io/)
- Customers named: pr.co, HotelsByDay, People, Productif, Belkins, TrafficPartner, TNW, Business Radio X

## What it publishes

Every page reply.io exposes, read 2026-09-29: 2177 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 592 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- case study: 7 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- webinar or virtual event: 53 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- conference or event: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- report or ebook: 56 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- comparison: 78 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- template or tool: 6 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 15 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- podcast or video: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- news or press: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/gtm.