# Relevance AI: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 15 judge labels across 3 categories by 10 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/vendors/relevance-ai

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [AI marketing agents](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/marketing/ai-marketing-agents/index.md) | 0% | 22 | 8% | 13 |
| [AI SDR agents](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/ai-sdr-agents/index.md) | 0% | 75 | 0% | 1 |
| [Product analytics](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/gtm-data/product-analytics/index.md) | 0% | 57 | 100% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "It's a strong fit for mid-market and enterprise marketing and GTM teams that want to build custom agent workflows" (Claude Haiku 4.5, AI marketing agents)
- "If you need to automate workflows between different apps, look at Zapier Agents or Relevance AI." (Qwen 3.7 Flash, AI marketing agents)
- "More flexible and customizable, but requires more setup and workflow design than suite-native tools." (Perplexity Sonar, AI marketing agents)
- "The Best for Structured Campaigns & Workflows: Relevance AI or Copy.ai" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, AI marketing agents)

## And against it

- "can burn through credits quickly, making it risky for teams with limited budgets" (Mistral Small, Product analytics)
- "needs more setup than turnkey agents" (Muse Glimmer 30B, AI marketing agents)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Relevance AI, from 25 of the 25 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- folk.app: 10
- gane.ai/index: 9
- superscale.ai: 8
- supermetrics.com: 7
- startupstash.com: 5
- thecmo.com: 5
- whatagraph.com: 5
- gtm8020.com: 4
- kite.ai: 4
- nicklafferty.com: 4

### Pages cited

- https://folk.app/articles/best-marketing-ai-agents: 10
- https://superscale.ai/compare/the-best-ai-marketing-agents: 8
- https://supermetrics.com/blog/ai-agents-for-marketing: 7
- https://startupstash.com/top-ai-marketing-agents: 5
- https://thecmo.com/tools/best-ai-marketing-agent: 5
- https://whatagraph.com/blog/articles/ai-marketing-agents: 5
- https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/marketing/ai-marketing-agents: 4
- https://gtm8020.com/blog/best-ai-marketing-agents: 4

## In its own words

What Relevance AI's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: Specialist AI Agents for Every Task (https://relevanceai.com/)
- For: enterprise teams (https://relevanceai.com/)
- Price stated: Free plan (https://relevanceai.com/features/embed)
- Free plan or trial: Try for free (https://relevanceai.com/features/embed)
- Integrations claimed: 1000 (https://relevanceai.com/); 2000 (https://relevanceai.com/pricing) (pages disagree)
- Certifications: GDPR, SOC 2 Type II
- Customers named: Autodesk, Canva, Qualified, Send Payments, Zembl, Lightspeed Commerce, Rakuten Advertising, Lightspeed

## What it publishes

Every page relevanceai.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 6937 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 236 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-02-26
- case study: 12 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2024-04-23
- webinar or virtual event: 11 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-01
- conference or event: 11 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- report or ebook: 39 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2023-04-20
- comparison: 42 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-05-21
- template or tool: 643 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 15 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-07-18
- news or press: 6 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-05-21 comparison: Arcads alternatives https://marketplace.relevanceai.com/compare/arcads-alternatives
- Recent: 2026-05-18 comparison: Huggingface alternatives https://marketplace.relevanceai.com/compare/huggingface-alternatives
- Recent: 2026-03-01 webinar or virtual event: Webinar event agents https://marketplace.relevanceai.com/use-cases/webinar-event-agents
- Recent: 2026-02-26 blog: Adaptive context management for production ai agents https://relevanceai.com/blog/adaptive-context-management-for-production-ai-agents
- Recent: 2026-02-16 comparison: Replicate alternatives https://marketplace.relevanceai.com/compare/replicate-alternatives
- Recent: 2026-02-12 blog: How we used ai to clean up feature flags and open sourced it https://relevanceai.com/blog/how-we-used-ai-to-clean-up-feature-flags-and-open-sourced-it

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/gtm.