# Qwilr: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 76 judge labels across 5 categories by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/vendors/qwilr

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Proposal software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/revops/proposal-software/index.md) | 0% | 8 | 12% | 51 |
| [RFP response software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/rfp-response-software/index.md) | 0% | 16 | 8% | 13 |
| [CPQ](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/revops/cpq/index.md) | 0% | 20 | 10% | 10 |
| [Sales enablement and content](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/sales-enablement-and-content/index.md) | 0% | 39 | 0% | 1 |
| [Value selling tools](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/value-selling-tools/index.md) | 0% | 95 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "Interactive web proposals with embedded media... Higher price and less suitable if conventional PDF workflows dominate" (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)
- "Great for interactive, web-based proposals (4.6/5 on Capterra)... but not as specialized for complex RFP responses." (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "Choose Qwilr/GetAccept if design-forward, interactive proposals and a digital sales room experience are prioritized" (Muse Glimmer 30B, RFP response)
- "Choose Quotient or Qwilr if you have straightforward products and want the lowest-cost, easiest implementation." (Perplexity Sonar, CPQ)

## And against it

- "Avoid higher-end options like Qwilr ($39+/mo)" (Grok 4.20, Proposals)
- "primarily proposal, quoting, design, and e-signature tools—not dedicated RFP knowledge-management platforms" (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)
- "Qwilr - Steep Learning Curve: Many users find the interface has a long learning curve that's "discouraging"" (MiniMax M2.5, Proposals)
- "but it's pricier at $35/user/month annually, so it's better if presentation matters more than low cost" (GPT-5.4 mini, Proposals)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 8 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qwilr, from 196 of the 222 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- g2.com: 98
- softwareadvice.com: 94
- capterra.com: 68
- proposify.com: 67
- pandadoc.com: 64
- zapier.com: 62
- thedigitalprojectmanager.com: 47
- qwilr.com: 44 (its own site)
- spotsaas.com: 43
- guideflow.com: 39

### Pages cited

- https://zapier.com/blog/best-proposal-software: 50
- https://g2.com/categories/proposal: 47
- https://softwareadvice.com/proposal-management: 44
- https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-proposal-software: 36
- https://guideflow.com/blog/best-proposal-software: 31
- https://softwareadvice.com/cpq: 29
- https://freshbooks.com/hub/estimates/best-proposal-software: 26
- https://proposify.com/: 26

## The company

Qwilr; https://qwilr.com/; Redfern, Australia; founded 2014. From Wikidata, fetched 2026-09-14.

## In its own words

What Qwilr's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: proposal software for modern sales teams (https://qwilr.com/)
- For: modern sales teams; all your GTM teams (https://qwilr.com/)
- Price stated: Starter: $35 USD per user/month annual billing; Growth: $275 USD per month includes 5 users annual billing only; Scale: $750 USD per month includes 10 users annual billing only (https://qwilr.com/pricing)
- Starting price: 35 (https://qwilr.com/pricing)
- Free plan or trial: No credit card required | 14 day free trial (https://qwilr.com/)
- Integrations claimed: 9 (https://qwilr.com/partners)
- Customers named: LaunchNotes, Brisant Secure, Lorikeet, Verbate

## What it publishes

Every page qwilr.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 1142 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 360 pages, 20 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-24
- case study: 43 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-01-22
- webinar or virtual event: 25 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- conference or event: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-10-09
- report or ebook: 8 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-01-20
- comparison: 31 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-06-04
- template or tool: 159 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2021-09-01
- glossary or explainer: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2021-10-05
- podcast or video: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2024-02-17
- news or press: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Mcp for sales teams https://qwilr.com/blog/mcp-for-sales-teams
- Recent: 2026-09-23 blog: New 7 proposal prompts to try with the qwilr mcp https://qwilr.com/blog/new-7-proposal-prompts-to-try-with-the-qwilr-mcp
- Recent: 2026-09-22 blog: New your gong calls now automatically personalize your proposals https://qwilr.com/blog/new-your-gong-calls-now-automatically-personalize-your-proposals
- Recent: 2026-09-18 blog: New automate zoho crm tasks with qwilr https://qwilr.com/blog/new-automate-zoho-crm-tasks-with-qwilr
- Recent: 2026-09-15 blog: Consolidate proposal esignature payment tools https://qwilr.com/blog/consolidate-proposal-esignature-payment-tools
- Recent: 2026-09-15 blog: Integrate proposal workflows salesforce https://qwilr.com/blog/integrate-proposal-workflows-salesforce

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/gtm.