# Loopio: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 89 judge labels across 3 categories by 14 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/vendors/loopio

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [RFP response software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/rfp-response-software/index.md) | 31% | 1 | 20% | 64 |
| [Proposal software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/revops/proposal-software/index.md) | 0% | 9 | 0% | 24 |
| [Customer success platforms](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/customer/customer-success-platforms/index.md) | 0% | 45 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "Loopio — Often the top-rated for mid-market. Excellent content library, strong AI suggestions, clean collaboration, great Salesforce integration." (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "Prefer specialized RFP response platforms ... (e.g., Responsive/formerly RFPIO, Loopio, or alternatives like RocketDocs, Tribble, or AutoRFP.ai)" (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "the two names that consistently top the lists for RFP response / Strategic Response Management are Responsive, formerly RFPIO, and Loopio" (Muse Glimmer 30B, RFP response)
- "1. Loopio ⭐ 4.6/5 - Best for: Mid-market to enterprise companies handling high volumes of RFPs, DDQs, and security questionnaires" (GLM 4.7 FlashX, RFP response)

## And against it

- "What to Avoid ... Loopio ... often require custom quotes typically ranging from $15,000 to $25,000+ per year" (Qwen 3.7 Flash, RFP response)
- "Avoid (Unless Budget Allows Later): Loopio | Requires a custom quote; ... still enterprise-oriented." (Kimi K2, RFP response)
- "Avoid enterprise tools like Responsive (formerly RFPIO), Loopio, or full AutoRFP.ai" (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "Avoid enterprise platforms such as Responsive, Loopio, or Qvidian" (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Grok 4.20 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Mistral Small | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 9 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 6 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 7 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Loopio, from 250 of the 273 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- responsive.io: 123
- softwareadvice.com: 108
- capterra.com: 94
- g2.com: 93
- loopio.com: 76 (its own site)
- getapp.com: 68
- thedigitalprojectmanager.com: 51
- guideflow.com: 50
- deeprfp.com: 47
- sifthub.io: 47

### Pages cited

- https://softwareadvice.com/rfp: 59
- https://capterra.com/rfp-software: 39
- https://techtarget.com/news/The-top-10-RFP-response-software/848889: 39
- https://softwareadvice.com/proposal-management: 37
- https://guideflow.com/blog/rfp-software: 35
- https://loopio.com/: 34
- https://deeprfp.com/blog/best-rfp-tools-comparison: 33
- https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-rfp-software-reviewed: 33

## In its own words

What Loopio's own pages state, read 2026-09-28. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: AI RFP Software with a Competitive Edge (https://loopio.com/)
- For: teams responsible for responding to RFPs, RFIs, DDQs, and security questionnaires (https://loopio.com/)
- Price stated: starting with our Foundations tier, which includes 10 seats; Enhanced or Enterprise package (https://loopio.com/)
- Integrations claimed: 275 (https://loopio.com/); 80 (https://loopio.com/platform/) (pages disagree)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA, ISO 27001
- Customers named: Zendesk, DocuSign, Allied Universal, HubSpot, Celonis, Alight, SimCorp, Netskope

## What it publishes

Every page loopio.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 471 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 167 pages, 14 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- case study: 13 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-01-15
- webinar or virtual event: 3 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-15
- conference or event: 3 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-09-12
- comparison: 17 pages, 3 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-08-21
- template or tool: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-03-19
- glossary or explainer: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-01-26
- Recent: 2026-09-28 blog: Investment management rfp https://loopio.com/blog/investment-management-rfp/
- Recent: 2026-09-17 blog: Best ddq software private equity https://loopio.com/blog/best-ddq-software-private-equity/
- Recent: 2026-09-15 blog: Go no go decision https://loopio.com/blog/go-no-go-decision/
- Recent: 2026-09-15 webinar or virtual event: Mcp webinar https://loopio.com/resources/mcp-webinar/
- Recent: 2026-09-03 blog: Increase win rate https://loopio.com/blog/increase-win-rate/
- Recent: 2026-09-02 blog: Best ai software rfp responses https://loopio.com/blog/best-ai-software-rfp-responses/

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/gtm.