# AutoRFP.ai: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 23 judge labels across 2 categories by 10 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/vendors/autorfp-ai

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [RFP response software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/sales/rfp-response-software/index.md) | 2% | 8 | 19% | 21 |
| [Proposal software](https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/revops/proposal-software/index.md) | 0% | 24 | 0% | 2 |

## What the models said for it

- "AutoRFP.ai offers flexible, transparent pricing and project-based plans suitable for variable workloads" (Gemini 3.5 Flash, RFP response)
- "Choose AutoRFP.ai or Inventive AI when speed and low implementation effort matter more than deep governance." (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)
- "AutoRFP.ai and Inventive AI are the strongest starting points because they are fast, affordable, and easy to run" (Claude Haiku 4.5, RFP response)
- "If your team mainly needs fast drafting: look at AutogenAI, Inventive, or AutoRFP.ai." (GPT-5.4 mini, RFP response)

## And against it

- "Avoid enterprise tools like Responsive (formerly RFPIO), Loopio, or full AutoRFP.ai" (Grok 4.20, RFP response)
- "often heavy on marketing claims, but users report it struggles with complex, multi-format compliance matrices" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, RFP response)
- "pricing is reportedly about $899/month, so it is less suitable for a tight budget" (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)
- "though it has less established market history than Loopio" (Perplexity Sonar, RFP response)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AutoRFP.ai, from 81 of the 86 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- responsive.io: 50
- autorfp.ai: 36 (its own site)
- g2.com: 33
- sifthub.io: 30
- softwareadvice.com: 29
- loopio.com: 28
- thedigitalprojectmanager.com: 26
- arphie.ai: 25
- capterra.com: 25
- inventive.ai: 23

### Pages cited

- https://thedigitalprojectmanager.com/tools/best-rfp-software-reviewed: 22
- https://guideflow.com/blog/rfp-software: 20
- https://softwareadvice.com/rfp: 20
- https://responsive.io/blog/best-rfp-software: 18
- https://arphie.ai/blog/top-5-rfp-tools-for-streamlining-your-proposal-process: 16
- https://capterra.com/rfp-software: 16
- https://sifthub.io/blog/rfp-software-for-small-business: 16
- https://autorfp.ai/blog/best-rfp-software-for-enterprise: 15

## In its own words

What AutoRFP.ai's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: The agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster. (https://autorfp.ai/)
- For: global teams (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Price stated: $899, $1299 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Starting price: 899 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Free plan or trial: 30-day money-back guarantee (https://autorfp.ai/pricing)
- Integrations claimed: 18 (https://autorfp.ai/)
- Certifications: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, UK GDPR, CCPA, EU Cloud Code of Conduct
- Hosting: US, EU, AU, US West (Oregon), EU Central (Frankfurt), Australia East (Sydney)
- Customers named: SugarAI, Workforce.com, fintechOS, perk, Jobylon, IMTC, Red Rover, MedeAnalytics

## What it publishes

Every page autorfp.ai exposes, read 2026-09-29: 309 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 150 pages, 20 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-14
- case study: 14 pages, 1 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-08-18
- conference or event: 7 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-10-15
- comparison: 28 pages, 14 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-16
- template or tool: 4 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- glossary or explainer: 3 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-04-15
- Recent: 2026-10-15 conference or event: Sme chase and how to win it https://autorfp.ai/events/sme-chase-and-how-to-win-it
- Recent: 2026-09-16 comparison: Best govwin alternatives https://autorfp.ai/blog/best-govwin-alternatives
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: 1up pricing https://autorfp.ai/blog/1up-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: How Much Does AutogenAI Cost in 2026? https://autorfp.ai/blog/autogenai-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 blog: Iris pricing https://autorfp.ai/blog/iris-pricing
- Recent: 2026-09-14 comparison: Responsive vs autogenai comparison https://autorfp.ai/blog/responsive-vs-autogenai-comparison

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/gtm/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/gtm.