# SAP Sustainability Control Tower alternatives: what AI models name instead, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. 227 of the 252 answers in the 1 category where SAP Sustainability Control Tower holds a standing named it neither first nor as an alternative; these are the first choices those answers made. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/finance/vendors/sap-sustainability-control-tower/alternatives

## Named instead, most often (every category and segment added)

- Greenly: 41
- Workiva ESG: 27
- Persefoni: 23
- Watershed: 18
- Sweep: 10
- Sustain.Life: 7

## ESG and carbon reporting

**Small business**: 84 of 84 answers did not name SAP Sustainability Control Tower (SAP Sustainability Control Tower is #16 of 17 at 0%).

- Greenly: first choice in 28 of those 84
- Persefoni: first choice in 11 of those 84
- Sustain.Life: first choice in 7 of those 84
- ESGgo: first choice in 4 of those 84
- Normative: first choice in 4 of those 84
- Seedling: first choice in 4 of those 84
- Metrio: first choice in 3 of those 84
- Sweep: first choice in 3 of those 84

**Mid-market**: 78 of 84 answers did not name SAP Sustainability Control Tower (SAP Sustainability Control Tower is #13 of 13 at 0%).

- Greenly: first choice in 13 of those 78
- Persefoni: first choice in 9 of those 78
- Workiva ESG: first choice in 9 of those 78
- Sweep: first choice in 7 of those 78
- Watershed: first choice in 4 of those 78
- ESG Lift: first choice in 3 of those 78
- Emerald Power: first choice in 3 of those 78
- Horizon ESG: first choice in 2 of those 78

**Enterprise**: 65 of 84 answers did not name SAP Sustainability Control Tower (SAP Sustainability Control Tower is #8 of 11 at 0%).

- Workiva ESG: first choice in 18 of those 65
- Watershed: first choice in 14 of those 65
- IBM Envizi: first choice in 4 of those 65
- APLANET: first choice in 3 of those 65
- Persefoni: first choice in 3 of those 65
- Novisto: first choice in 2 of those 65
- Generation Impact: first choice in 1 of those 65
- SmartSuite: first choice in 1 of those 65

Published under CC BY 4.0. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.