# Fireblocks: how AI models rank it, November 2026

Gane Index, November 2026 Edition. Named in 16 judge labels across 2 categories by 10 of 14 models. Page: https://www.gane.ai/index/finance/vendors/fireblocks

## Standing by category

| Category | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Stablecoin platforms](https://www.gane.ai/index/finance/treasury/stablecoin-platforms/index.md) | 0% | 24 | 20% | 15 |
| [Crypto accounting](https://www.gane.ai/index/finance/accounting/crypto-accounting/index.md) | 0% | 33 | 0% | 1 |

## What the models said for it

- "If you need more control over treasury / wallet architecture: evaluate Fireblocks and BVNK alongside Circle" (GPT-5.4 mini, Stablecoin platforms)
- "Choose Fireblocks when key management, policy controls, and institutional self-custody matter most." (Perplexity Sonar, Stablecoin platforms)
- "adding Fireblocks only if the company needs its own institutional custody and wallet-control layer" (Perplexity Sonar, Stablecoin platforms)
- "Want self-managed custody and network transfers at scale: Fireblocks." (Muse Glimmer 30B, Stablecoin platforms)

## And against it

- "Might be overkill (and pricier) for a pure mid-sized B2B without heavy institutional requirements." (Grok 4.20, Stablecoin platforms)
- "Fireblocks | Institutional custody standard | Treasury and custody, not payments per se" (DeepSeek V4 Flash, Stablecoin platforms)
- "without requiring the scale of crypto-native firms like Fireblocks or Anchorage Digital" (MiniMax M2.5, Stablecoin platforms)

## By model

| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Warning | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |

## Sources returned with these answers

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fireblocks, from 51 of the 63 answers that named it (only the models that return a source list).

### Domains cited

- fireblocks.com: 25 (its own site)
- osl.com: 19
- stablecoininsider.org: 19
- eco.com: 15
- cbinsights.com: 14
- fintechspecs.com: 14
- photonpay.com: 13
- upshift.finance: 13
- circle.com: 12
- stripe.com: 12

### Pages cited

- https://osl.com/en/bits/article/best-enterprise-stablecoin-payment-platforms-comparison-review: 18
- https://eco.com/support/en/articles/15232571-best-stablecoin-infrastructure-providers-for-b2b-platforms-2026: 12
- https://fireblocks.com/report/compare-enterprise-stablecoin-payments: 9
- https://upshift.finance/blog/stablecoin-infrastructure-companies: 9
- https://fintechspecs.com/blog/best-stablecoin-infrastructure-providers: 8
- https://fluidrwa.com/vendors/stablecoin-infrastructure-providers: 8
- https://guideflow.com/blog/stablecoin-infrastructure-software: 8
- https://cbinsights.com/esp/blockchain/payments/stablecoin-payments-infrastructure: 7

## In its own words

What Fireblocks's own pages state, read 2026-10-05. Stated by the vendor, not checked by the index.

- Positioning: enterprise grade digital asset and stablecoin infrastructure that powers financial possibility for organizations of all sizes (https://fireblocks.com/)
- For: organizations of all sizes (https://fireblocks.com/)
- Price stated: Essentials: $999 per month, up to 6 months. Custom: Starting at $36,000 per year. (https://www.fireblocks.com/pricing)
- Starting price: 999 (https://www.fireblocks.com/pricing)
- Free plan or trial: The Developer Sandbox is the quickest way to evaluate Fireblocks and begin testing your application with our APIs, SDKs, and Console. (https://www.fireblocks.com/pricing)
- Integrations claimed: 30 (https://www.fireblocks.com/pricing)
- Certifications: ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 1 Type II, Crypto Currency Security Standard
- Customers named: MoneyGram, QCP, ABN AMRO, Revolut, Bridge, GSR, Sentora, Galaxy

## What it publishes

Every page fireblocks.com exposes, read 2026-09-29: 2571 addresses. By kind, pages and the last 90 days:

- blog: 500 pages, 14 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- case study: 74 pages, 4 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- webinar or virtual event: 21 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-03-07
- conference or event: 13 pages, 2 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-14
- report or ebook: 71 pages, 23 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-09-28
- comparison: 12 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2025-08-25
- template or tool: 2 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2021-05-25
- glossary or explainer: 49 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2026-06-29
- podcast or video: 1 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest undated
- news or press: 176 pages, 0 in the last 90 days, latest 2023-11-28
- Recent: 2026-09-28 blog: Shipovnik signature forgery discovered https://www.fireblocks.com/blog/shipovnik-signature-forgery-discovered
- Recent: 2026-09-28 report or ebook: Financial grid corporates https://www.fireblocks.com/report/financial-grid-corporates
- Recent: 2026-09-28 case study: Bitvavo https://www.fireblocks.com/customers/bitvavo
- Recent: 2026-09-25 blog: Tokenized collateral is live in production https://www.fireblocks.com/tokenized-collateral-is-live-in-production
- Recent: 2026-09-24 blog: Citadel dtcc tokenization https://www.fireblocks.com/blog/citadel-dtcc-tokenization
- Recent: 2026-09-24 report or ebook: Buyers guide fintechs https://www.fireblocks.com/report/buyers-guide-fintechs

## Record

- Method: https://www.gane.ai/index/finance/methodology
- License: CC BY 4.0. Cite as Gane Index, November 2026 Edition, www.gane.ai/index/finance.